Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To End Racism and Police Brutality, End Capitalism! [View all]davidn3600
(6,342 posts)39. Social Identity Theory
Henri Tajfel's greatest contribution to psychology was social identity theory.
Social identity is a persons sense of who they are based on their group membership(s).
Tajfel (1979) proposed that the groups (e.g. social class, family, football team etc.) which people belonged to were an important source of pride and self-esteem. Groups give us a sense of social identity: a sense of belonging to the social world.
In order to increase our self-image we enhance the status of the group to which we belong. For example, England is the best country in the world! We can also increase our self-image by discriminating and holding prejudice views against the out group (the group we dont belong to). For example, the Americans, French etc. are a bunch of losers!
Therefore we divided the world into them and us based through a process of social categorization (i.e. we put people into social groups).
This is known as in-group (us) and out-group (them). Social identity theory states that the in-group will discriminate against the out-group to enhance their self-image.
The central hypothesis of social identity theory is that group members of an in-group will seek to find negative aspects of an out-group, thus enhancing their self-image.
Prejudiced views between cultures may result in racism; in its extreme forms, racism may result in genocide, such as occurred in Germany with the Jews, in Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsis and, more recently, in the former Yugoslavia between the Bosnians and Serbs.
Henri Tajfel proposed that stereotyping (i.e. putting people into groups and categories) is based on a normal cognitive process: the tendency to group things together. In doing so we tend to exaggerate:
1. the differences between groups
2. the similarities of things in the same group.
We categorize people in the same way. We see the group to which we belong (the in-group) as being different from the others (the out-group), and members of the same group as being more similar than they are. Social categorization is one explanation for prejudice attitudes (i.e. them and us mentality) which leads to in-groups and out-groups.
Social identity is a persons sense of who they are based on their group membership(s).
Tajfel (1979) proposed that the groups (e.g. social class, family, football team etc.) which people belonged to were an important source of pride and self-esteem. Groups give us a sense of social identity: a sense of belonging to the social world.
In order to increase our self-image we enhance the status of the group to which we belong. For example, England is the best country in the world! We can also increase our self-image by discriminating and holding prejudice views against the out group (the group we dont belong to). For example, the Americans, French etc. are a bunch of losers!
Therefore we divided the world into them and us based through a process of social categorization (i.e. we put people into social groups).
This is known as in-group (us) and out-group (them). Social identity theory states that the in-group will discriminate against the out-group to enhance their self-image.
The central hypothesis of social identity theory is that group members of an in-group will seek to find negative aspects of an out-group, thus enhancing their self-image.
Prejudiced views between cultures may result in racism; in its extreme forms, racism may result in genocide, such as occurred in Germany with the Jews, in Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsis and, more recently, in the former Yugoslavia between the Bosnians and Serbs.
Henri Tajfel proposed that stereotyping (i.e. putting people into groups and categories) is based on a normal cognitive process: the tendency to group things together. In doing so we tend to exaggerate:
1. the differences between groups
2. the similarities of things in the same group.
We categorize people in the same way. We see the group to which we belong (the in-group) as being different from the others (the out-group), and members of the same group as being more similar than they are. Social categorization is one explanation for prejudice attitudes (i.e. them and us mentality) which leads to in-groups and out-groups.
http://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
236 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who said anything about Cuba? I thought we were talking about ending capitalism?
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#10
can you give examples where it has happened and racism or other bigotry went away ?
JI7
Jul 2015
#14
So you're talking about the psychology problem, like what makes people have hate in their heart ?
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#29
it's cultural also, the racist cops and others don't always benefit financially themselves
JI7
Jul 2015
#32
If we debate definitions we will not have time to discuss the heart of the issue
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#61
Worker owned cooperatives and banks, democratic workplaces, living wages, etc.
Dont call me Shirley
Jul 2015
#74
If you think racism in Cuba is bad you should take a look at the United States, it's 100 times worse
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#22
Are you talking about psychology, like what makes people have hate in their heart ?
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#25
I think you are confusing slave mode of production with slave as commodity in capitalist system.
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#44
I think you are confusing slave mode of production with slave as commodity in capitalist system.
Cheese Sandwich
Jul 2015
#41
The problem is that Marx never talked of Slavery as more than just a primitive form
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#198
what is the historical reality which shows end of capitalism resulted in end of racism
JI7
Jul 2015
#16
End capitalism? AS IF we are still a nation that practices capitalism! Not even close.
Rex
Jul 2015
#60
It's not 'red-baiting' when you started a thread proclaiming the superiority of Marxist ideas
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2015
#107
Yes Syriza is a shining example of what your New Economy will look like Nadin Imao....
AOR
Jul 2015
#183
So modern day American marxists have also given up on being at the forefront of the strugle
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2015
#185
"Show me a successful Marxist country" is not a question that has any relevance....."
EX500rider
Jul 2015
#120
So no Mom & Pop stores. No technology. No furniture that you don't build yourself.
randome
Jul 2015
#70
Which people? Because the collective will never come to true consensus on anything specific.
FrodosPet
Jul 2015
#178
Bigotry and racism have existed always, there were ethnic purges and pogroms in ancient times.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#71
Bigotry against different culture probably...institutionlized racism... not even close.
AOR
Jul 2015
#81
Living in the U.S.S.R., wasn't too pleasant. They got rid of capitalism and their system collapsed.
demosincebirth
Jul 2015
#163