Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
6. Shell restricted from drilling into any oil-bearing rock layers - for now
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:55 AM
Jul 2015

The restriction remains in place until the damaged ice breaker, Fennica, reaches Oregon, is repaired, and returns to the Arctic drilling sites. The Fennica carries the capping stack - an absolutely critical and required safety device in the event of a break at the ocean bottom, as happened with BP in the Gulf. Without this equipment ready to be deployed, Shell cannot drill.

So why, you may ask, did the Fennica suffer a gash in its hull when it had left Dutch Harbor and was headed to the drilling site, forcing it to head to Oregon for repair, and delaying govt. approval to drill into oil-bearing rock layers? As reported 2 days ago by station KUCB in Unalaska, that's because the world's largest oil company, Shell relied on depth charts based on EIGHTY YEAR OLD surveys done w/sextants & hand-held lines! That's as opposed to modern, electronic surveys. Good grief! Hand-held lines and sextants! 80 years ago! What could possibly go wrong?

http://kucb.org/news/article/asdf/

Shell’s Damaged Icebreaker Fennica Heads to Oregon for Repairs
By John Ryan
Monday, July 20 2015

The Fennica was sailing between Hog Island and the Dutch Harbor airport on Amaknak Island. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration charts show that channel being shallower than the waters around the other side of Hog Island, where Shell kept its oil rigs while they were in Dutch Harbor.

The channel the Fennica sailed, under guidance of a harbor pilot, was even shallower than the area’s 80-year-old charts showed.

My source in Unalaska pointed out to me that Shell is required to cease operations between September 24 & 29, because that's when the really rough weather starts. One only wonders what other SHELL fubars await between now and then.

Charts still in use in the Aleutians and Arctic Alaska are based on surveys conducted in 1935 with sextants and hand-held lines to plumb the depths.

After the incident, the NOAA ship Fairweather, already in the area on a mission to better map Arctic shipping routes, did a modern, electronic survey and found rocky areas less than 30 feet deep, including one just 22.5 feet deep. The Fennica sits 27.5 feet deep in the water.


Turning to today's news, here are excerpts from an article by the same reporter in Unalaska/Dutch Harbor/station KUCB


http://kucb.org/news/article/interior-dept-oks-arctic-drillingwith-limits/
Interior Dept. OKs Arctic Drilling—With Limits
By John Ryan
Wednesday, July 22 2015

(The damaged Fennica icebreaker, shortly before leaving Dutch Harbor for Oregon. KUCB/John Ryan photo.)

The Obama administration approved Shell’s Oil’s plan for drilling in the Arctic Ocean Wednesday. But for now at least, Shell is restricted on how deep it can drill. With a key piece of Shell’s oil-spill equipment currently heading away from the Arctic, the Interior Department told the company it cannot drill into any oil-bearing rock layers.

Shell’s “capping stack” is on board an icebreaker, the Fennica, that apparently hit an uncharted rock and tore a three-foot hole in its hull in Dutch Harbor on July 3. The Fennica is now about halfway through its weeklong journey from Dutch Harbor, 1000 miles south of the drilling site, to a shipyard in Portland, Oregon, for repairs.

“Fennica’s going the opposite direction,” Brian Salerno, head of the Interior Department’s Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, said. “Until such time as the Fennica makes hull repairs and then is able to return to Arctic with the capping stack, the restriction will remain in place.”

The federal permits also prevent Shell from drilling its two planned wells, which are about 9 miles away from each other some 70 miles off the northwest Alaskan coast, at once. That rule aims to protect walruses in the area from drilling noise.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k&r nt bananas Jul 2015 #1
Better yet, boycott Shell until they relent and any other company that thinks about going there. Dustlawyer Jul 2015 #2
Article in OP yesterday said the permit conditions are strong and Shell may stop the exploration?? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #3
May be a warrior, Jakes Progress Jul 2015 #8
That was highly illogical and unfactual. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #10
Great post. RiverLover Jul 2015 #16
Not a warrior, an enabler. Any drilling there, under any "conditions" is reckless. RiverLover Jul 2015 #13
A long and bumpy road is ahead for Big Oil, has Obama not made it clear he does not have a Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #22
A Stand By ship capable of "capping all leaks" does not exist. bvar22 Jul 2015 #36
Your rationalizations are sad for our environment. BP had great restrictions BUT NO ONE rhett o rick Jul 2015 #40
What in the actual fuck? MynameisBlarney Jul 2015 #4
Baloney. RiverLover Jul 2015 #18
I wish I could tell you how bad an idea this. roguevalley Jul 2015 #20
LOL Skittles Jul 2015 #25
Obama delivers for his "base" (again!!!!) nt Romulox Jul 2015 #5
Shell restricted from drilling into any oil-bearing rock layers - for now Divernan Jul 2015 #6
Good info. Thanks. RiverLover Jul 2015 #19
"Shell’s “capping stack” is on board an icebreaker.... bvar22 Jul 2015 #38
Nobody knows where the "oil bearing rock layers are. bvar22 Jul 2015 #61
I think Obama just put the car in reverse. jalan48 Jul 2015 #7
Not very impressive argument ya got there. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #11
Climate change warrior? Really? jalan48 Jul 2015 #23
What utter nonsense. NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #28
How else to explain a 'climate warrior' allowing drilling in the pristine Arctic? jalan48 Jul 2015 #31
How are they spending it to get what they want? NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #32
Why do you think a climate warrior would allow drilling in that area? jalan48 Jul 2015 #33
G'head. NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #35
Wasn't "Drill, Baby, Drill" a campaign slogan for the Republicans in 2008? bvar22 Jul 2015 #39
Exactly. He's a lame duck President, there is no need for him to do this. Why is the question? jalan48 Jul 2015 #43
LOL jalan48 Jul 2015 #42
Just the kind of hard-hitting evidence ... NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #44
Maybe you can give me your theory on why he did this. jalan48 Jul 2015 #45
You state that Obama ... NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #46
True Believer I see. jalan48 Jul 2015 #47
Just someone who can't be bothered ... NanceGreggs Jul 2015 #48
Who gives a damn what the rationale is and what does being black have to do with anything? TheKentuckian Jul 2015 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author Jakes Progress Jul 2015 #9
Perhaps Thespian2 Jul 2015 #12
His financial benefactors cashing in their chit's during his final time in office. NorthCarolina Jul 2015 #14
Nonsense. Not a shred of evidence or logic being used for an "argument" can makes one appear rather silly and shrill. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #49
presidents cant always do what the base would like, cut him some slack frankieallen Jul 2015 #15
ha! Well that's one lesson Obama has taught us over & over & over RiverLover Jul 2015 #17
no. he won't get any from me roguevalley Jul 2015 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #41
alright then, what are the consequences if he doesn't push this? what DIRE NEED is he filling? MisterP Jul 2015 #24
Personally, I have already "cut him" lots of slack. ladjf Jul 2015 #56
Lived through one oil spill, Blue_In_AK Jul 2015 #26
Betrayal? What are you talking about? Maedhros Jul 2015 #27
Heartbreaking to f up a pristine place chenildieu Jul 2015 #29
Drill baby drill MFrohike Jul 2015 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2015 #34
"My policies are republican from the '80s"- Barack Obama nationalize the fed Jul 2015 #37
"Reagan is my hero." MoonRiver Jul 2015 #51
That statement disappointed me greatly. ladjf Jul 2015 #55
I really don't understand where he was coming from. MoonRiver Jul 2015 #57
In my opinion, many of the initiatives he has supported were more Republican ladjf Jul 2015 #59
Bingo. We can't call it betrayal, he is a 1980s Republican LondonReign2 Jul 2015 #52
The President is back to his old Republican tricks again. Too bad. ladjf Jul 2015 #53
Hope And Change - A Perpetual Betrayal cantbeserious Jul 2015 #54
Shell oil is a criminal organization WDIM Jul 2015 #58
Oh No fadedrose Jul 2015 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cries of Betrayal, Calls ...»Reply #6