Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
58. How relevant is that?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 07:36 PM
Jul 2015

We can see the video of the "arrest."

The officer lost his temper over nothing. He took her off camera. We can assume that he knew that he was going to beat her up, although that has to be proved. We never saw what she looked like after that although there may be some video of her in her cell.

She complained that the officer was hurting her wrists. Could the scars on her wrists have been recent and due to the officer's conduct or were they most definitely older.

Even if she did smoke pot and cut herself, that information would have nothing to do with the false arrest and the stress that she would have suffered as a result of her terrible treatment by the officer.

In fact, if she was mentally vulnerable, a defendant has to take the plaintiff or the victim for what they are. If she was vulnerable, the officer had a duty to treat every person as vulnerable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Key words safeinOhio Jul 2015 #1
Politics behind this... For Freddie Jul 2015 #37
I thought that the feds are already involved. niyad Jul 2015 #2
That's what I read. n/t whathehell Jul 2015 #19
FBI already involved, I think... Helen Borg Jul 2015 #42
I hope her family gets mucifer Jul 2015 #3
race class sex and money. lonestarnot Jul 2015 #4
put this to a beat Quayblue Jul 2015 #15
Check out the ACLU's letter in PDF format to the sheriff.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #17
I hate to open docs i am not certain of, and I trust YOU for sure, is there anyway you randys1 Jul 2015 #27
It's scanned images of a five page document from the ACLU.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #34
Doesn't surprise me lobodons Jul 2015 #45
And then, you will note that a little bit before he starts chasing her and she actually JDPriestly Jul 2015 #50
Cops will do that. Follow you close and wait for you to make a mistake..... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #62
Well done... MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #61
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2015 #5
Cops lie. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #6
And fabricate "evidence" all the fucking time. nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #51
Yep. Makes ya wonder. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2015 #53
Has anyone put out contact formation where this officer gets a paycheck ? MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #7
(979) 826-8282 Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #18
Just keeps ringing and ringing, Spitfire... MrMickeysMom Jul 2015 #59
They must have unplugged it.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2015 #60
The feds already are involved. cstanleytech Jul 2015 #8
Did they say if the family has yet had its own autopsy completed? pnwmom Jul 2015 #9
I thought there was to be an independent autopsy done at the request of the family. whathehell Jul 2015 #20
Yes, they did leftieNanner Jul 2015 #23
Sounds arrogant to me. Kalidurga Jul 2015 #10
Zing! DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2015 #14
Big time CORRECTO, my friend. Anansi1171 Jul 2015 #36
Seriously. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #46
Yeah, and "accidently" mix her body up with one scheduled for cremation. GoneFishin Jul 2015 #56
yep... BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2015 #63
Here is a link to The Last Word's video of the lawyer's statement.... xocet Jul 2015 #11
They'd be crazy to hand over her body... CoffeeCat Jul 2015 #12
The autopsy was performed at the Harris County Institute of Forensic Science tammywammy Jul 2015 #24
The fact that they thought they could do a cover up autopsy onecaliberal Jul 2015 #52
Just more harrassment of the grieving family. Midnight Writer Jul 2015 #13
Unbelievable. SoapBox Jul 2015 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #21
How do the Texas cops know that the other autopsy doesn't agree with theirs? GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #22
Just a FYI, all hangings don't involve being off the ground tammywammy Jul 2015 #26
But how does a conscious, non-drugged person strangle herself with her feet on the ground? pnwmom Jul 2015 #35
Because hanging doesn't generally kill you by cutting off your air initially metalbot Jul 2015 #39
That's how Robin Williams (RIP) died. leftieNanner Jul 2015 #43
Are you sure he wasn't on some kind of sedating drug? pnwmom Jul 2015 #44
The toxicology report leftieNanner Jul 2015 #68
He had Parkinson's, so I wonder if he was taking any medication for that pnwmom Jul 2015 #69
Hadn't thought of the Parkinson's drugs leftieNanner Jul 2015 #70
I'm still waiting for a credible autopsy LittleBlue Jul 2015 #25
The autopsy was done at the Harris County Institute of Forensic Science tammywammy Jul 2015 #29
I feel certain it was still part of the good ol' boys network. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #32
Wow, that gives me a lot more confidence... NOT! BillZBubb Jul 2015 #57
I want to know how this will ever get a fair trial Marrah_G Jul 2015 #28
That's one more reason this is so tragic chenildieu Jul 2015 #49
How relevant is that? JDPriestly Jul 2015 #58
Because it shows he has already decided Marrah_G Jul 2015 #64
Oh. I meant the statements about Sandra. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #65
Its not relevant Marrah_G Jul 2015 #66
They aren't relevant at all, because they did not contribute to her death or Yo_Mama Jul 2015 #67
Where is AG Loretta Lynch? Maedhros Jul 2015 #30
FBI is on the ground, they will refer to DOJ....... msanthrope Jul 2015 #47
I think we all know what they did. Enthusiast Jul 2015 #31
Oops! The coverup is slipping! blackspade Jul 2015 #33
I would welcome them to do all the autopsies they want rocktivity Jul 2015 #38
Southernese-English translation: forest444 Jul 2015 #40
Killing her wasn't enough? left-of-center2012 Jul 2015 #41
Wow wheniwasincongress Jul 2015 #48
Of course Milliesmom Jul 2015 #54
Sandera was murder: but, her family should sue for her civil rights too! lewebley3 Jul 2015 #55
Yeah. I agree. Too risky. mmonk Jul 2015 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Sandra Bland's ...»Reply #58