Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. The story studiously avoids saying anything about that
Fri May 18, 2012, 08:08 AM
May 2012

It's difficult to say. In one paragraph, the woman is four-square in favor of Obamacare, but in another she's totally against employers being required to pay for insurance for their employees. There's no indication by either Ms. Watson or the account that one of the trade-offs the Republicans insisted on was that coverage for pre-existing conditions meant mandatory buying of insurance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cancer patient who voted ...»Reply #5