Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who else feels the same [View all]sgtbenobo
(327 posts)51. Really?
Would you even have read my post if not for the epithet?
My ignorant cat likes you too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Spoons don't kill people, people kill people. The best defense against a bad guy with a spoon...
George II
Jul 2015
#84
I went to the movies the other day, and for the first time in my life I had it
AllFieldsRequired
Jul 2015
#15
in violent countries you internalize this behavior: everyone keeps a certain distance from
MisterP
Jul 2015
#42
NRA to malaise: why are you advancing policy while so emotional, that will not do!
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#19
Add me to your 'amen corner'. I am tired of the NRA narrative and apologizing for its stupity....
marble falls
Jul 2015
#20
Since the Brady Bill Gun Regulation has become the third rail of politics.
Agnosticsherbet
Jul 2015
#30
You're overstating what PLCAA did. Dealers and manuf. can be sued for negligent actions.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#57
Does that mean you are for the PLCAA? Or are you just defending it because that's how Sanders voted?
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#62
Of course I'm for the PLCAA. It prevented cynical attempts to bankrupt smaller companies.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#66
We don't know what the outcome would have been since that law prevented the parents from going forward
pnwmom
Jul 2015
#75
Fortunately, that won't go anywhere. And again, dealers and manuf. can be sued for negligence.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#78
You'll never get an answer to that question, from the people that support such things.
beevul
Jul 2015
#168
Don't call for any action - they will come after you with all those things
liberal N proud
Jul 2015
#53
Considering current policing practices who is likely to get their door kicked in for guns?
Fumesucker
Jul 2015
#106
As I said, what is different from now? Do you think that would result in more doors being kicked in?
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#142
And as I said, and what is different from now? You think it makes a difference to an unscrupulus
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#141
how many gunsters have used their weapons to save themselves from the police?
Doctor_J
Jul 2015
#132
What?! That was a post about how innocent people would get hurt by forced confiscation
Taitertots
Jul 2015
#135
I don't think any of the proposed legislation would have prevented that massacre.
aikoaiko
Jul 2015
#61
The one is the handmaiden of the other, for an enormous amount of money is made each year ...
Hekate
Jul 2015
#170
Like I said before. I'm old enough to remember when we talked about banning handguns.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2015
#83
I've long since given up on this. If Sandy Hook wasn't enough, I dont know what would be
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#87
Gun ownership here is a large death cult at this point. It's a religion. Many enthusiasts are more
stevenleser
Jul 2015
#92
We clearly see it similarly: a death cult demanding daily human blood sacrifices. nt
Hekate
Jul 2015
#94
Time to reform the 2nd amendment. We need to spell out what typexs of guns can and can't be owned.
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#95
And I always ask, what is your solution? And if you say "collect all the guns" then you are not....
Logical
Jul 2015
#104
There is a reason a swimming pool or certain dogs will raise your home owners premium
hack89
Jul 2015
#157
The shooter was clearly embittered by events that befell him. He acted criminally on that
HereSince1628
Jul 2015
#131
Feeling the same. We should go back to the grammar of the 2nd Amendment and use proper English
kelliekat44
Jul 2015
#166