Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)

2. Not just no, HELL no

Reply to ghostsinthemachine (Original post)

Fri Jul 24, 2015, 04:19 PM

Jul 2015

Letting him in would do a tremendous disservice to all of those who got in without using drugs to do it, even more so to those who got close but missed out.

It's completely absurd to me that assholes like Bonds get away with a slap on the wrist for their crimes while someone like Pete Rose gets suspended for life, for GAMBLING. Really? Insanity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It�s Time to Reconsider Barry Bonds for the Hall of Fame [View all] ghostsinthemachine Jul 2015 OP

Um, nope. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #1

Not just no, HELL no tkmorris Jul 2015 #2

So should they toss all drug users out then? ghostsinthemachine Jul 2015 #3

'They all did it' is not a very convincing argument. Dawgs Jul 2015 #8

no artislife Jul 2015 #4

His chances are jack and shit... London Lover Man Jul 2015 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2015 #6

Fuck that shit -- I could name a bunch who belong in the HOF before he does... Blue_Tires Jul 2015 #7

I don't think so madokie Jul 2015 #9