Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hot water kills half of Columbia River sockeye salmon [View all]Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)31. kick
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
from the article...Experts said drought and record heat this summer are behind the high water temper
spanone
Jul 2015
#3
But the point is, CGS uses the atmosphere as its ultimate heat sink, not the river.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#58
No, watt for watt they are similar. You don't obviate a watt for watt replacement by
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#76
That is some cheap shit right there. Can't refute the point so you decide I must
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#85
I never said human activity doesn't affect climate change. In fact, I specified the opposite.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#96
Oh, so suddenly you're worried about reflectivity of the atmosphere rather than human thermal activi
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#97
Which of course has nothing to do with the dead fish in the op or the river temp.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#145
Hermiston natural gas power plant downriver from the Columbia generating station
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#107
Calling for Scientific Research to examine the Colombia River and the rise in heat...
bvar22
Jul 2015
#129
The reactor, and the larger number/watts of gas fired generators on the Columbia are monitored by
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#130
LOL - and all the cigarettes people smoke cause the temperature to rise in the summer
dbackjon
Jul 2015
#40
Evaporative cooling and radiative cooling are entirely different components of the atmospheric heat
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#135
Is the industry fucking around pumping hot water uphill to kill the fish?
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#133
Nuclear power plants can and must be a contributor to the rise in temp.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#88
Congratulations, you steered a conversation about global warming, a well-founded explanation
CreekDog
Jul 2015
#127
The amount of heat any power generating station is allowed to put into the river is carefully regula
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#60
So it IS possible for the heat discharge from a Nuke Plant to destroy a river's ecology.
bvar22
Jul 2015
#62
You started lying and misrepresenting in post 69 so don't play the wounded animal.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#122
Adds heat that could remain out of he heat engine of the atmosphere for a long time.
AtheistCrusader
Aug 2015
#161
Global Warming IS complicated, many, many components, many, many sources, many, many LIES.
bvar22
Jul 2015
#142
You know Hanford's leaky barrels of nuclear waste are just up stream where the Columbia bends...
Tikki
Jul 2015
#44
Nuclear waste is a problem, but not one that contriubtes to the river temperature.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2015
#165
There used to be one, the Trojan Plant (i think), but it's been long shut down. I don't know of any
rhett o rick
Jul 2015
#54
Yes, you're right. Eventually it will be us. But is sure ruined my night and will through the whole
trillion
Jul 2015
#33
Victims of global warming, as will be all of the animals and fish that eat them in
geek tragedy
Jul 2015
#5
I don't know, shanti, maybe with the ongoing drought you've got down there...
countryjake
Jul 2015
#103