Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
25. she was not very active
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 04:10 AM
Jul 2015

1800 posts in 8 years is like 4 posts a week. Or like 12 posts in one day, and then nothing for three weeks.

In the one thread I followed from a hidden post, she did not seem particularly nasty. Taking an unpopular position, but not especially nasty about it. There were, however, some self-deleted posts which may have been nasty, but aren't there permanently.

Obviously, the people who knew her and paid attention to her, knew her better than I did and EarlG found something he really didn't like, but this strikes me as an example.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6711772

Her post there wasn't at all nasty. Not that I am agreeing with her, but I can see people that I like who might. Like say, my mom, who freaked out about my little sister's bikini way back when. Or a former pastor whose daughter had to wear a shirt when swimming.

I myself think it is kinda silly, but is it really worth drawing a line in the sand and saying that ALL of my friends need to agree with me on THIS issue, or we cannot be friends? Really? That sounds more like my fundamentalist cousin than it does a progressive.

Yet I notice in that very thread a few other DUers jumping in to the debate only to add the opinion - "you don't belong here".

Is that part of our super-secret plan to win elections or to make the Democratic Party and/or the country more progressive? By keeping our group pure and making sure we all march in lock-step?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good. I have been appalled at ann's posts for quite a while. nt tblue37 Jul 2015 #1
Good riddance shenmue Jul 2015 #2
I missed that one. johnp3907 Jul 2015 #3
That one was horrible. She was one of the few that agreed with a popular DUer on Cosby. stevenleser Jul 2015 #4
Good work, EarlG! City Lights Jul 2015 #5
Troll, rape apologist, transphobe, misogynist indeed. JTFrog Jul 2015 #6
almost 8 years hfojvt Jul 2015 #7
That one was a quietly nasty type. You wouldn't notice her unless she messed with you.nt bravenak Jul 2015 #21
she was not very active hfojvt Jul 2015 #25
I think it was just the way she behaved. bravenak Jul 2015 #28
addition by subtraction. they ought to look at the jurors who voted geek tragedy Jul 2015 #8
I don't think Skinner will start banning people based upon their jury votes. Nye Bevan Jul 2015 #22
I missed her Warpy Jul 2015 #9
The last part's nothing special. hifiguy Jul 2015 #20
I once almost replied "is your last name Romney?" to one of her posts, but I decided not to (nt) TacoD Jul 2015 #10
Fuck, I got a hide against her BainsBane Jul 2015 #11
Good. PeaceNikki Jul 2015 #12
Yep, a particularly nasty piece of work! Spazito Jul 2015 #13
Have to agree with Codeine on this one. Rex Jul 2015 #14
thankyou Earl olddots Jul 2015 #15
Yay!!nt bravenak Jul 2015 #16
...why'd it take over 7 1/2 years? Hong Kong Cavalier Jul 2015 #17
Never heard of her alcibiades_mystery Jul 2015 #18
Racist too, if I recall. Starry Messenger Jul 2015 #19
You are correct. 'ann-' was very negative overall and often made ugly posts. r/t freshwest Jul 2015 #23
Yeah, no surprise with that one. WorseBeforeBetter Jul 2015 #24
Let me join you.... Behind the Aegis Jul 2015 #26
There goes another one ... Hekate Jul 2015 #27
I wish there was a end of the month who's who of banned trolls on the front page. MerryBlooms Jul 2015 #29
You are absolutely right gollygee Jul 2015 #30
Their misogyny was getting truly scary! LeftishBrit Jul 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm gonna grave dance for...»Reply #25