Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Ms. Yertle (Reply #43)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i said something similar in a different thread yesterday restorefreedom Jul 2015 #1
Ironically, they complain about today's already low tax rate. Democrats_win Jul 2015 #2
huh? hill2016 Jul 2015 #3
Your concern has been duly noted. tenderfoot Jul 2015 #4
I was pointing out hill2016 Jul 2015 #17
No. I made the same point in another board. Springslips Jul 2015 #65
how about this Skittles Jul 2015 #72
Newbies aren't allowed to do that dumbcat Jul 2015 #115
Yeah, 50K for a wedding is excessive. Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #6
well hill2016 Jul 2015 #15
So you agree, 50K is excessive. Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #24
+1 BeanMusical Jul 2015 #86
of all of Mrs. Clinton's supporters that I know and have known CreekDog Jul 2015 #7
That's what Limbaugh used to call her back in the '90s. Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #16
yeah, i'm waiting for that one to slip and call her "Billary" CreekDog Jul 2015 #18
LOL. I remember that one! Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #25
Then what? pintobean Jul 2015 #64
then you'll chime in to tell everyone I was right CreekDog Jul 2015 #78
Lol! BeanMusical Jul 2015 #87
I happen to like hill2016 Jul 2015 #20
50k for a wedding? Good gawd almighty that's obscene. Juicy_Bellows Jul 2015 #8
depends if you're also flying relatives in, because they can't afford to be there otherwise. haele Jul 2015 #79
Wait - think about it Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #84
I don't know what ours cost, but it must have been obscene DFW Jul 2015 #91
This douche has gone on many obscenely expensive trophy hunts. City Lights Jul 2015 #10
no.the point is they CAN afford to pay higher taxes JI7 Jul 2015 #19
depends: do they live in Manhattan? CreekDog Jul 2015 #21
? Yeah and you'd never find a person like him Ever Duppers Jul 2015 #26
Actually I know a guy Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #90
How did you come t that conclusion from what the OP wrote? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #27
let's examine the premise hill2016 Jul 2015 #36
That's a false equivalency and is a logical fallacy notadmblnd Jul 2015 #40
sorry hill2016 Jul 2015 #60
Again with the reading comprehension notadmblnd Jul 2015 #62
huh hill2016 Jul 2015 #63
Hi; not taking sides in this subthread Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #92
me too hill2016 Jul 2015 #102
Please answer. Or I am gonna die Syzygy321 Aug 2015 #123
50K would have built schools in Zimbabwe. Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #5
Hiya, Ilios Meows! City Lights Jul 2015 #11
Thanks! Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #14
Oh hell, it could help a few underfunded schools here.. whathehell Jul 2015 #59
In the ideal situation Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #85
Yes, because Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #9
Your slip is totally showing tenderfoot Jul 2015 #23
Oh to hear that knock at the door, the driver standing there with a steaming box -- byronius Jul 2015 #75
Are you part of the one percent? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #28
No, I'm not Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #32
Are you saying that the rich already pay enough taxes? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #33
I think the government could manage its $$$ Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #38
then advocating for the rich is just merely a hobby for you? notadmblnd Jul 2015 #44
I'm not advocating for the rich Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #54
yes you are advocating for the rich here. notadmblnd Jul 2015 #61
I hope the 30+ year free ride the wealthy have been enjoying comes to an end. tenderfoot Jul 2015 #34
Well-- Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #35
Oh the poor put upon doctors who charge through the nose for their services. tenderfoot Jul 2015 #39
I see you didn't answer my question Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #41
Some people become doctors because they actually about people. tenderfoot Jul 2015 #47
Yup Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #49
They take an oath - so yeah. tenderfoot Jul 2015 #50
I am one of those doctors :) Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #95
I am genuinely curious about a couple things uppityperson Jul 2015 #97
I think I stumbled across it while searching the Internet Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #99
DU is a big tent. uppityperson Jul 2015 #104
Well, for example, look at this thread. Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #107
Hah - a perfect example is Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #118
which post was alerted, what were jury results, remarks? Aha, this one? uppityperson Jul 2015 #119
So if a doctor dbackjon Jul 2015 #106
Hah, doubtful! Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #110
That is far too extreme dbackjon Jul 2015 #114
It's not about 'confiscation of excess income,' it's about taxing wealth more than we do now Gormy Cuss Jul 2015 #42
Sure-- Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #48
At one time the rich were taxed a rate of 94% currently they pay no more than about 35% notadmblnd Jul 2015 #51
About that 94% tax rate . . . Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #52
Right. And Kennedy lowered it to 70% or so d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #77
Ahhh - but that was the beauty of the old tax rates ... Whiskeytide Jul 2015 #89
Did I say they paid it? I dont think so. notadmblnd Jul 2015 #111
Nobody ever paid anything close to 91% of their income in taxes. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2015 #101
I once had a patient - young, black, disabled - Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #93
perhaps a luxury tax of $500 on every $250,000 hunt? or a Federal tax of dollar a bullet? Sunlei Jul 2015 #29
A luxury tax would be a good thing Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #43
telling people what they can do with their own $$ is only okay when it involves poor people... tenderfoot Jul 2015 #45
Yes, and limiting what can be puchased with food stamps. tosh Jul 2015 #53
My area has a huge drug problem - Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #98
I appreciate what you are saying Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #103
Results... Major Nikon Jul 2015 #109
Please google the article Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #120
The OP simple said tax people that rich more treestar Jul 2015 #76
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2015 #96
Actually all money DOES belong to the government. johnp3907 Jul 2015 #31
I can only imagine the convenience of possessing a mind which allows one to see in terms... LanternWaste Jul 2015 #55
Yeah, me too Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #58
Your superiority is noted. byronius Jul 2015 #74
There's another "good thing" that comes from it. jeff47 Jul 2015 #12
50k is cheap for those hunts because it was a lion.They cough-up much more for endangered species. Sunlei Jul 2015 #13
The rich require exotic thrills. DirkGently Jul 2015 #22
It's an addiction. BeanMusical Jul 2015 #70
The issue is about who inherits the earth and its biota swilton Jul 2015 #30
with the mudslinging from Planned Parenthood PatrynXX Jul 2015 #37
An earthquake caused by fracking Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #67
Well, that's just goldang Leveler talk. byronius Jul 2015 #46
If Ms. Yertle Jul 2015 #57
And why is the cut-off $250k? hill2016 Jul 2015 #69
I'm just slinging numbers out from the hip, so to speak. byronius Jul 2015 #116
Because they love the work? byronius Jul 2015 #71
You make really thoughtful points. Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #100
Thank you for that response. byronius Jul 2015 #108
Thanks. Makes sense to me. Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #112
I will add that I didn't mean to Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #113
An odd point of history to add to Whiskeytide's response -- byronius Jul 2015 #117
I think it's kind of hard to be a good heart transplant surgeon CreekDog Jul 2015 #80
I often say that the uber-wealthy ought to be taxed out of existence. hunter Jul 2015 #56
Well said. byronius Jul 2015 #73
His wealth compared to yours is nothing compared to... Taitertots Jul 2015 #66
Do firefighters 'deserve' to earn their money? Ilios Meows Jul 2015 #68
Proof that wealth does not trickle down? Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #81
No no fucking role anywhere. You have the same genes. lonestarnot Jul 2015 #83
As the wildlife? Or the hunters? Syzygy321 Jul 2015 #88
It is pretty clear what you were touting, so why do you ask me to explain what you stated? No role lonestarnot Aug 2015 #121
Your hostility puzzled me Syzygy321 Aug 2015 #122
Not just the rates, but where those rates fall... JHB Jul 2015 #82
Well, he's certainly been accused of "shining a spotlight" on something. Fawke Em Jul 2015 #94
+1000000000000 dbackjon Jul 2015 #105
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Walt Palmer (poacher) is ...»Reply #96