Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
19. No it isn't. I invite your attention to very recent American history.
Fri May 18, 2012, 07:21 PM
May 2012

There was a cadre of people who initially supported a clown named Ronald Reagan during the election that put Ford against Carter. These people pretended to support Ford, but they breathed a HUGE sigh of relief when he lost, because they knew if he won, they'd be stuck with him for eight years, but since he lost, the Reagan crew could go up against Carter in a scant four years.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. The Santorum people have no fucking reason to vote for Mitt Romney--all he is is an OBSTRUCTION to them in four years. Obama, OTOH, is done, with no clear successor in four years. If they want to see "President Santorum" in the White House in the next go-round, the guy to vote for is OBAMA or some third-party asswipe, not RMoney.

Anyone playing a long-view game can see that quite plainly. I won't even go into the demoralized attitude of the GOP--they have reason to feel that way, too--they're all a bunch of whining idiots.

Massachusetts is a woefully SEXIST state. We have yet to send a woman to the Senate, and we have a lousy record with female office-holders in general. It is an interest area of mine, seeing more women in public office in MA.

The voting public voted for Brown because they didn't like his female opponent. They voted for RMoney because they didn't like HIS female opponent. I voted for both female candidates, but alas, I am but one individual. Also, RMoney ran millions of dollars of very pretty ads that promised that the second he was elected governor, he'd call up all his "business" friends and they'd fire up factories in the poor communities in western MA and elsewhere. Of course, once elected, he did no such thing, and MA dropped to 47th in New Job Creation. We lost a congressional seat (Barney's, in fact) because we were redistricted out of a seat due to the exodus from MA due to Romney-era job losses.

You probably don't understand that MA is a "weak governor" state (like TX). The governor does nothing without the consent of Beacon Hill, which is overwhelmingly Dem, overwhelmingly "old school," and overwhelmingly corrupt in the sense that it's not just who you know, it's who you (rhymes with know). It's why RMoney got little done, unless the Powers That Be in the MA legislature said it was "ok."

So, to answer your question, THAT's how we got Naked Brownie and RMoney. They got the gigs, but were hamstrung from the git-go.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The polls are completely manufactured. obxhead May 2012 #1
Just like Kerry vs. Bush Hawkowl May 2012 #2
Kerry had likability issues--but RMoney's are way worse, IMO. nt MADem May 2012 #5
Interesting meme that people love to repeat politicasista May 2012 #13
Good grief--you're **completely** wrong about my reasoning. MADem May 2012 #18
Ok.... politicasista May 2012 #21
Like I always say, it's NOT a CONTEST. MADem May 2012 #24
Ok, agree that politicasista May 2012 #31
We need real campaign finance reform, so we can have guys like Paul Wellstone representing us. MADem May 2012 #34
Ok. You must be a politicasista May 2012 #35
I've given my Senator my votes, my money, and my time. MADem May 2012 #36
Understood politicasista May 2012 #37
We're cool--I like a little discussion! Never worry! MADem May 2012 #38
Yes we are. politicasista May 2012 #40
Bush was the likable drunk; Kerry had a mediocre campaign. longship May 2012 #15
Thanks to Cahill and Shrum politicasista May 2012 #16
Agree on the ignorance Hawkowl May 2012 #41
If we sit on our asses this year, then yes, we really could be in serious danger. AverageJoe90 May 2012 #42
I think he will win, but won't be surprised if he loses... WI_DEM May 2012 #3
It would not surprise me if people who purport to support RMoney publicly vote for Obama privately. MADem May 2012 #4
Your position is akin to whistling newblewtoo May 2012 #12
No it isn't. I invite your attention to very recent American history. MADem May 2012 #19
I agree. Wait Wut May 2012 #6
Well his attempt to outdo Obama failed miserably... Initech May 2012 #7
that stadium appears to be about 1% full 0rganism May 2012 #25
I suspect the final margin hifiguy May 2012 #8
And Rmoney will claim voter fraud and see if the USSC can pull a shrub for him. HopeHoops May 2012 #9
I think Pres O will bury RMoney in the debates. nt AtomicKitten May 2012 #10
Leave it to Obama to liven up a normally deadly dull telecast. randome May 2012 #11
I don't think there will be any debates.nt CK_John May 2012 #39
Prediction: Everyone is so confindent of an Obama win they stay home and Romney wins. nt Speck Tater May 2012 #14
Confidence can also mean acknowledging the truth. randome May 2012 #17
Silliness. RBInMaine May 2012 #27
I don't buy it. Why? cali May 2012 #20
For once.. sendero May 2012 #22
kick Dawson Leery May 2012 #23
Make it so. K&R FSogol May 2012 #26
If People are Convinced that Obama will win StitchesforSnitches May 2012 #28
Sure, Obama will whip Robdme, but what about Diebold/Sequoia/ESS? Scuba May 2012 #29
I'm hoping you are right madokie May 2012 #30
I doubt it. People are fickle. They just vote their guts feeling. Not logic. Logical May 2012 #32
I disagree Prophet 451 May 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Prediction: Come November...»Reply #19