Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What is the difference between the "Server" Hillary was using for her eMails [View all]Exilednight
(9,359 posts)25. Two part answer here
Last edited Sun Aug 2, 2015, 06:54 AM - Edit history (1)
1. As previously stated, it has to do with where the emails are stored.
2. She OWNS the server, but those emails belong to the U.S. government.
Those emails are paid for by my tax dollars. Technically, those emails belong to us. We are a goverment of the people, by the people and for the people; with that being said those emails are the people's.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What is the difference between the "Server" Hillary was using for her eMails [View all]
AverageGuy
Aug 2015
OP
I'm sure 'Name Removed' would have had a brllliant reply to make if only he had the chance
pinboy3niner
Aug 2015
#5
Your computer isn't receiving top secret emails, thereby jeopardizing national security.
linuxman
Aug 2015
#13
Oh, so it's a safety issue, rather than a "how dare these little people question me" issue.
name not needed
Aug 2015
#38
The Secret Service protects this one for President Clinton. And during the same period of time
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#21
Well, it's been years since Hillary's was discontinued. And we KNOW 250,000 .gov emails
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#34
Hillary's personal server certainly wasn't....little fish in a big pond method
VanillaRhapsody
Aug 2015
#43
Please provide a link to these 250k State Department .gov emails that you claim Wikileaks released
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#35
Please provide a link to your claim that I said Wikileaks released all those emails.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#37
You're claiming 250k .gov emails were leaked to Wikileaks (but not released?) Where's your proof?
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#39
I know Wikileaks released diplomatic cables. Where are the 250k .gov State Department emails
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#41
The term "cable" is defined by the state dept. as a "communication (message) sent electronically."
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#45
I just showed you that by the State Department's own definition, the word "cable" includes emails.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#49
LOL. You're really grasping at straws trying to argue that cables are email.
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#52
You obviously didn't read the whole article because you didn't learn anything from it.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#53
I already know what cables are. You obviously are furriously trying to learn about them
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#54
No, they weren't all available to millions of people. And the difference these days between cables
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#59
And Hillary's .gov emails could have been downloaded by someone who had access to them.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#61
Millions of people don't have access to ALL those cables, and you know that perfectly well.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#63
I know perfectly well that millions of people had access to all those cables.
DesMoinesDem
Aug 2015
#64
your ISP owns the 'server' your emails are stored on. The Clintons owned a 'server' .
Sunlei
Aug 2015
#14
Where did you get the idea I was talking about anything other than her SoS correspondence?
Exilednight
Aug 2015
#47
Do you really want to go down the road of Hillary's lies over the past three decades?
Exilednight
Aug 2015
#57