General Discussion

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

13. That is very much exactly what you are doing. There is no 'vitriol' in that post to you.

Sat Aug 1, 2015, 04:24 PM

Aug 2015

Your verbiage in the OP is there to read. You should try to learn that presenting government owned and operated 'sources' by suggesting they are more valid than other sources is laughable, so people will laugh.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Are you someone who values the truth . . . [View all] another_liberal Aug 2015 OP

If you believe the truth is what the Russian government says... Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #1

I don't trust anyone to tell me the truth . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #2

Yet here you are pushing the Russian government's narrative. PeaceNikki Aug 2015 #3

I am not doing any such a silly thing! another_liberal Aug 2015 #6

That is very much exactly what you are doing. There is no 'vitriol' in that post to you. Bluenorthwest Aug 2015 #13

Hi Blue! another_liberal Aug 2015 #24

"suspects"? "Suspects" of what, exactly? PeaceNikki Aug 2015 #26

You had to be following me on these boards a year or so ago to understand . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #32

Unlike some, I don't keep dossiers on DUers, so I have no idea what you were doing last year. PeaceNikki Aug 2015 #34

I question your understanding of the word "vitriol". PeaceNikki Aug 2015 #30

Everything should be open to "question". . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #33

Well, the Russian government's mouthpiece said Russia didn't do it. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #4

"Everyone else" says that Russia did it? another_liberal Aug 2015 #7

This exactly... ion_theory Aug 2015 #38

Thanks for seeing that, ion_theory. another_liberal Aug 2015 #42

As if our government is honest and believable. -none Aug 2015 #5

I am, but I never expect to find it on sputniknews.com MineralMan Aug 2015 #8

It is your prerogative to reject my source . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #9

A lot of people claim they didn't do it when caught. Governments are no better. hobbit709 Aug 2015 #10

You got that right! another_liberal Aug 2015 #20

The "truth" belongs to whomever gets their first and slaps on the label. nt Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #11

No . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #18

I think you are confusing truth with perspective. nt ion_theory Aug 2015 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #43

Wow, Sputnik and PCR in the same post. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #12

Read the article . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #14

I love these attempts at Iraq analogies. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #17

What "Iraq analogy?" another_liberal Aug 2015 #22

sputnik. LOL... SidDithers Aug 2015 #15

Hi Sid! another_liberal Aug 2015 #16

Not only that, but a Sputnik article citing the one and only Paul Craig Roberts. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #19

Of course . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #21

And those are the only two sources on this issue. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #23

Oh, hardly the only two . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #27

You're the only one who brought up Nuland. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #31

As Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs she is central to our policy in Ukraine . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #35

And again, I don't care what she has to say on the issue. NuclearDem Aug 2015 #36

I hate violent, aggressive foreign policy, whomever it may be championed by . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #41

Putin's propaganda publication pushing a white-supremacist... SidDithers Aug 2015 #25

Truth will out malaise Aug 2015 #28

Yes . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #29

You post far too much pro-Russian news sources. randome Aug 2015 #37

In your opinion, perhaps . . . another_liberal Aug 2015 #40

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #44

You're back! NuclearDem Aug 2015 #45