Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals the 'most disappointing' Supreme Court decision of her career [View all]StevieM
(10,596 posts)5. For me it is Citizens United, Bush vs. Gore and Adoptive Couple vs. Baby girl, when Veronica Brown
was ripped from the home of her loving and devoted father, and the Indian Child Welfare act was completely gutted.
Of course, I am talking about recent cases, ones that took place this century. (If you count 2000 as this century, which I realize that many people do not, since technically it began in 2001).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals the 'most disappointing' Supreme Court decision of her career [View all]
n2doc
Aug 2015
OP
I have said many times it was definitely the US's worst foreign policy decision EVER.
7962
Aug 2015
#20
Bush v Gore decided the other way would not have resulted in Gore taking his rightful office.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#22
Take a look at this Google search. I was living in Florida at the time and was volunteering for
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#25
The slate of electors chosen as a result of such an act by the Florida legislature
Samantha
Aug 2015
#29
Of course it would have been challenged. And the Constitutional remedy for disputed electors where
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#34
And by the way, the argument against it being improper is pretty strong. Namely Article 2 Section 1
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#35
For me it is Citizens United, Bush vs. Gore and Adoptive Couple vs. Baby girl, when Veronica Brown
StevieM
Aug 2015
#5
The argument against that is that the UN has voted dozens of times to designate Al Qaeda
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#36
According to the NY Times 400 families provide half the money rasied in the 2016 election campaign.
jalan48
Aug 2015
#8
well, the top 400 families have half the wealth in the u.s., so that seems about right.
unblock
Aug 2015
#18