Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals the 'most disappointing' Supreme Court decision of her career [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)25. Take a look at this Google search. I was living in Florida at the time and was volunteering for
https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=florida%20state%20legislature%20votes%20to%20give%20electors%20to%20Bush&oq=florida%20state%20legislature%20votes%20to%20give%20electors%20to%20Bush&aqs=chrome..69i57.9062j0j7
the campaign. I was very close with the Gore folks sent to my county and got reports from them on a lot of stuff. I was actually trained to be an observer at the recounts in Pinellas County. I only got to observe one day before the SCOTUS decision.
Initially when the Florida State legislature announced they were going to have a special session to decide whether to intervene, they made a big deal about it. But then that session came and you had to look for what they decided. They decided to meet again on the morning of December 12th to have the actual vote. Because the SCOTUS decision followed literally minutes later, they decided to keep quiet what they had done because they realized how bad it would look, particularly since now it was no longer necessary.
Here are some other links:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/12/elec-d07.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=122367
http://www.authentichistory.com/1993-2000/3-2000election/3-dispute/
The timeline for this is:
Nov 30 - The Florida legislative committee recommended a special session to name the state's 25 electors.
Dec 7 - A formal proclamation was issued calling the Florida Legislature for a special session commencing December 8 to consider whether to go ahead with naming the states electors.
Dec 8 - The Florida Legislature met in special session, then adjourned with plans to reconvene on December 12.
Dec 12 - The Florida Legislature meets in the morning and votes to give Florida's electors to Bush. Shortly thereafter the SCOTUS released its decision and the Legislature decided to bury what they had done.
the campaign. I was very close with the Gore folks sent to my county and got reports from them on a lot of stuff. I was actually trained to be an observer at the recounts in Pinellas County. I only got to observe one day before the SCOTUS decision.
Initially when the Florida State legislature announced they were going to have a special session to decide whether to intervene, they made a big deal about it. But then that session came and you had to look for what they decided. They decided to meet again on the morning of December 12th to have the actual vote. Because the SCOTUS decision followed literally minutes later, they decided to keep quiet what they had done because they realized how bad it would look, particularly since now it was no longer necessary.
Here are some other links:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/12/elec-d07.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=122367
http://www.authentichistory.com/1993-2000/3-2000election/3-dispute/
The timeline for this is:
Nov 30 - The Florida legislative committee recommended a special session to name the state's 25 electors.
Dec 7 - A formal proclamation was issued calling the Florida Legislature for a special session commencing December 8 to consider whether to go ahead with naming the states electors.
Dec 8 - The Florida Legislature met in special session, then adjourned with plans to reconvene on December 12.
Dec 12 - The Florida Legislature meets in the morning and votes to give Florida's electors to Bush. Shortly thereafter the SCOTUS released its decision and the Legislature decided to bury what they had done.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ruth Bader Ginsburg reveals the 'most disappointing' Supreme Court decision of her career [View all]
n2doc
Aug 2015
OP
I have said many times it was definitely the US's worst foreign policy decision EVER.
7962
Aug 2015
#20
Bush v Gore decided the other way would not have resulted in Gore taking his rightful office.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#22
Take a look at this Google search. I was living in Florida at the time and was volunteering for
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#25
The slate of electors chosen as a result of such an act by the Florida legislature
Samantha
Aug 2015
#29
Of course it would have been challenged. And the Constitutional remedy for disputed electors where
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#34
And by the way, the argument against it being improper is pretty strong. Namely Article 2 Section 1
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#35
For me it is Citizens United, Bush vs. Gore and Adoptive Couple vs. Baby girl, when Veronica Brown
StevieM
Aug 2015
#5
The argument against that is that the UN has voted dozens of times to designate Al Qaeda
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#36
According to the NY Times 400 families provide half the money rasied in the 2016 election campaign.
jalan48
Aug 2015
#8
well, the top 400 families have half the wealth in the u.s., so that seems about right.
unblock
Aug 2015
#18