Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was a ridiculous ruling. How, can this be any hint of a democracy! n/t RKP5637 Aug 2015 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #32
Of course, if Bush v. Gore hadn't happened..... DFW Aug 2015 #2
A lot of things could of been different had 2000 happened differently Hydra Aug 2015 #3
Also wouldnt have gone into Iraq!! nt 7962 Aug 2015 #12
The world will be suffering from the consequences of that fiasco for decades DFW Aug 2015 #14
I have said many times it was definitely the US's worst foreign policy decision EVER. 7962 Aug 2015 #20
Agree--this was the worst decision both regarding consequences spooky3 Aug 2015 #38
I think it's Bush v Gore... IMO onecaliberal Aug 2015 #4
tough call, but justices tend to take the long view unblock Aug 2015 #6
Here's what makes Bush v Gore the worse decision... thesquanderer Aug 2015 #11
i see your point, though i'm no longer much into those time travel games. unblock Aug 2015 #17
Bush v Gore decided the other way would not have resulted in Gore taking his rightful office. stevenleser Aug 2015 #22
Interesting. thesquanderer Aug 2015 #23
Take a look at this Google search. I was living in Florida at the time and was volunteering for stevenleser Aug 2015 #25
The slate of electors chosen as a result of such an act by the Florida legislature Samantha Aug 2015 #29
Of course it would have been challenged. And the Constitutional remedy for disputed electors where stevenleser Aug 2015 #34
And by the way, the argument against it being improper is pretty strong. Namely Article 2 Section 1 stevenleser Aug 2015 #35
For me it is Citizens United, Bush vs. Gore and Adoptive Couple vs. Baby girl, when Veronica Brown StevieM Aug 2015 #5
I regret she didn't poison the Terrible Threes Demeter Aug 2015 #7
So you'd like to see them murdered? 7962 Aug 2015 #13
The death penalty, for mass murderers Demeter Aug 2015 #21
And who have the judges killed? Think carefully of course. 7962 Aug 2015 #24
Shall we start with Iraq and Afghanistan? Demeter Aug 2015 #31
If you're going to reach that far, you'd have to include Pres obama 7962 Aug 2015 #33
The argument against that is that the UN has voted dozens of times to designate Al Qaeda stevenleser Aug 2015 #36
I agree with you. The other guy would like to see 3 SCOTUS members killed! nt 7962 Aug 2015 #37
According to the NY Times 400 families provide half the money rasied in the 2016 election campaign. jalan48 Aug 2015 #8
well, the top 400 families have half the wealth in the u.s., so that seems about right. unblock Aug 2015 #18
Easy guess. EEO Aug 2015 #9
Bush v. Gore. Without The Stolen Election... Herman4747 Aug 2015 #10
One thing to consider RichVRichV Aug 2015 #16
excellent point. people forget that republicans had other ways of stealing the election. unblock Aug 2015 #19
Gentle reminder: Who was Gore's vice presidential candidate? RufusTFirefly Aug 2015 #26
Best current sitting justice on the SCOTUS. lark Aug 2015 #15
That was a most disastrous decision. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #27
It doesn't surprise me at all that is the one she is most disappointed with davidpdx Aug 2015 #28
We now live in a oligarchy. Sam_Fields Aug 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruth Bader Ginsburg revea...»Reply #27