Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(56,202 posts)
6. oh, and just to be clear, they are not "betting on" rmoney to win.
Fri May 18, 2012, 09:57 PM
May 2012

"rooting for", sure. but "betting on" is something else.

there are many reasons to contribute to political campaigns, but "because i think he's gonna win" actually is pretty low on the list.

in this case, the smart BET is certainly on obama to win re-election. but that's what intrade is for, or other forms of investment that might be influences by an election outcome.

but a campaign contribution is not a bet, but an attempt to influence outcomes (and not necessarily just for the recipient of the contribution) and post-election policies. in fact, the most effective contribution is to a campaign that you think WOULD LOSE were it not for your contribution.

mostly, i think their contributions are with an angle to capture the senate. even contributions to rmoney are with the senate in mind, because a failing presidential candidacy can spell disaster for a senatorial candidate of the same party.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Banking sector puts its m...»Reply #6