This message was self-deleted by its author

[AtheistCrusader]

222. It remains a possibility.

I noted some hedging in how 'verified' those posters were about the entirety of the situation. Another warning flag.

But this doesn't have to be a bifurcating issue between <honest> and <scam>. This could be something inbetween, like bad judgment.


You bet I say that dog should be given up to rescue. You bet. Still do. Current state as described still maintains contact and separation between TTW and the dog. Keeping the dog in a state of home-limbo until TTW's life is sorted, is not fair. And now, it has established dependency upon the caretakers, making it difficult or impossible for most reasonable people to back out of the deal. That relationship might not be abused, but It can be. Very easily. Seen it way too many times.

So yeah, it could still be a scam. Or it could just be a really bad situation. Abusive of the good nature of the people involved. Lots of possibilities.

I certainly don't see them opting to take the best option for the dog. Best option is a home. A Home(TM). Not temporary storage.