This message was self-deleted by its author

[daredtowork]

243. that's not a "red flag" that's "YOUR POINT OF VIEW"

And that's also the problem with ShielaT's scam theories and all the hole-poking she tries to do. The logic error you are mistaking is assuming you come from the eminent point of reason and your point of view should be applied to TTW's case.

Even though TTW is poor and ran out of resources, TTW has autonomy as a human being, and she still tries to make personal choices and hold on to things concerning her identity rather than let herself be controlled from above by schmucks like you. One problematic factor in here is she wanted to stay with her dog. A lot of "helpers" and "people who know better" and "people who were going to call her a scammer if TTW didn't do as they say" noted the fact that TTW didn't give away her dog or make it easier for herself to move by giving away her dog. '

That made her situation more difficult, but that doesn't constitute a "red flag" or make her a "scammer". It doesn't mean she "ignored resources". It simply means she was trying to keep her dog, and she was wiggling under the burning gaze of YOUR scrutiny as people like you informed her she would be a scammer if she asked for money but did not submit to your control.