"Dear Sir: I have been a viewer of MSNBC almost from day 1. There have been times when Ive waffled, namely the firing of Keith Olbermann, and times when Ive been very disappointed (the removal of Joy Reids informative show). Now Im afraid youve gone one step too far. Alex Wagners show was fabulous and no one can generate excitement over political issues like Ed Schultz. Why on earth would you cancel them? Yesterday I tuned in at 5 and there was Michael Eric Dyson. Hes a fine man and was a frequent guest on Eds show, but isnt quite up to par if you consider him a replacement for Ed. Luke Russert has been covering Alex Wagners hour. The young man is a fine reporter, but when it comes to filling an hour hes downright boring. For some strange reason youve pinned your hopes and dreams on Chuck Todd. I was trying to think if Ive ever heard anyone say something nice about Chuck Todd (other than his co-workers) and Ive come up empty handed. Its universally agreed hes put the nail in the coffin of Meet the Press. If you want to know why your ratings are low, its quite simple. Fox is free just about everywhere. I have to pay extra to get MSNBC in an upgraded satellite package. And it doesnt help having all those prison shows. If you expect to be watched as a news network, mealtime in cellblock 5 isnt going to cut it. Please consider what youre doing. You might try to emulate Fox in hopes of gaining viewers, but it wont happen. Viewers who want that kind of programming already have the real Fox for free. Sincerely, "