Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
14. General Eisenhower, among others, didn't think the atomic bombings were necessary
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:53 AM
Aug 2015

"...in [July] 1945... Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. ...the Secretary, upon giving me the news of the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using it, asked for my reaction, apparently expecting a vigorous assent.

"During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face'. The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude..."

- Dwight Eisenhower, Mandate For Change, pg. 380

In a Newsweek interview, Eisenhower again recalled the meeting with Stimson:

"...the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing."

- Ike on Ike, Newsweek, 11/11/63

http://www.doug-long.com/quotes.htm

It's that time of year again. [View all] uppityperson Aug 2015 OP
If they had told Oppenheimer the truth and let them see it from afar it would have ended as soon . orpupilofnature57 Aug 2015 #1
I thought this was going to be about Colorado peaches... pipoman Aug 2015 #2
I'm pretty convinced that, at the time, they felt both bombs were necessary. Maedhros Aug 2015 #3
General Eisenhower, among others, didn't think the atomic bombings were necessary Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #14
Eisenhower has IMHO been unfairly discounted as a thinker. He saw it but stevenleser Aug 2015 #15
There is a lot about the Pacific War that most Americans do not know Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #16
Truman and others obviously thought differently. Maedhros Aug 2015 #24
The story of the final days of the war is very complex Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #25
I think at the time the first was felt necessary, the second because they wanted to show they could uppityperson Aug 2015 #4
I'm reasonably sure the bombs were necessary Warpy Aug 2015 #5
I reasonably sure that you are dangerously wrong. GeorgeGist Aug 2015 #6
Good. Warpy Aug 2015 #12
Yes, both were necessary according the books I've read Lurks Often Aug 2015 #7
Each was more necessary than the Nanking Massacre Codeine Aug 2015 #8
Don't know. moondust Aug 2015 #9
Innocent women, children, and men should never be a target of war. Deadshot Aug 2015 #10
Plans were for us to drop 3-4 of them per month until surrender. roamer65 Aug 2015 #11
This seems relevant...Gar Alperovitz Cheese Sandwich Aug 2015 #13
They probably saved about a million lives all told Recursion Aug 2015 #17
I'm going to vote "neither" to balance out the poll. redgreenandblue Aug 2015 #18
I'm with you. My thinking has changed over the years from hell no, to maybe Hiroshima after talking uppityperson Aug 2015 #22
I don't comment on these threads usually. joshcryer Aug 2015 #19
So killing people who for the most part didn't participate in atrocities... redgreenandblue Aug 2015 #20
Nope. joshcryer Aug 2015 #21
As bad as the A bombs were sarisataka Aug 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's that time of year ag...»Reply #14