Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)

2. A contract is a contract. That's the point of making a contract, and this one is very clear.

Reply to greiner3 (Original post)

Sun Aug 9, 2015, 03:48 PM

Aug 2015

The insurance companies are within their rights unfortunately. Policies also don't pay out on suicides either, quite specifically.

Edited to add; if the insurance company were to pay out on this in spite of the contract, it would set a legal precedent that would have serious ramifications. Sometimes we have to be objective.

Sounds like it's time for her community to rally around her.... I sure hope they can and do, what a terribly tragic chain of events.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Insurance will not cover woman who lost house, grandson in arson fire [View all] greiner3 Aug 2015 OP

*headdesk* laundry_queen Aug 2015 #1

A contract is a contract. That's the point of making a contract, and this one is very clear. underahedgerow Aug 2015 #2