Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
22. I apologize. I shouldn't have been political earlier
Sat May 19, 2012, 04:54 PM
May 2012

I should have kept it to economics.

When one said, "There's no money left," that was not a meaningful statement. With the global economic slowdown the costs to the UK of borrowing were certain to only go lower and normal economics demanded, like flat out demanded increased deficit spending.

Not just increased spending, but increased deficit spending in particular. Net borrowing is down throughout the world, including in the UK. Borrowing is a major part of economic growth, including employment and wage growth. The government becomes the borrower of last resort.

The demand for credit in the UK affects interest rates. That demand is both government and private borrowing combined. If the private sector borrows 100 less and the government steps in to borrow 90 more, to stimulate the economy, or depress the economy less, the total demand for credit is still down 10.

But the increase of 90 in government borrowing will be said to be likely to drive up interest rates. When someone says that they are either very dense or they are politically or ideologically motivated to want to reduce government spending categorically, and are offering a plainly false argument toward that end.

Only right wing *economic* crack-pots failed to understand that interest rates would not and could not go up in the wake of this mess we are in unless 1) there was an imaginable default risk, or 2) the economy showed real (durable) signs of recovering.

Most right wing European politicians are to the left of American Democrats in some ways. But one can be moderate in ways while still being an economic crackpot. Jack Kemp was moderate on some things but an ardent believer that we need to return to the gold standard.

The US and UK and Japan (with a much larger debt than we have, I think) are not default risks. And net borrowing would still be down in those economies even if the government deficit was much larger. And if a government is preaching austerity the bond traders know there won't be any economic growth to worry about.

So of course interest rates will be low, whether the government tries austerity or stimulus. There is a real chance that interest rates will rise if there is enough stimulus, but that rise is not caused by the borrowing demands of the government, it is caused by the apprehension that the economy will recover as a result, making a 2% return on a bond a much less attractive proposition.

Cameron is depressing GDP in his nation in order to keep interest rates low because low rates lead to higher GDP. It is demented. It really is like saying the sun goes around the Earth.

There were economists who said, "Double the deficit and interest rates won't budge a bit." They were correct, but ignored. The higher interest rates were assumed by these weird right wing types to be in the offing even though they were nowhere to be found, and fought against despite their not existing (!)

Whatever pain you are experiencing from austerity is not only unnecessary, it is counter-productive.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You are unfortunately all too correct LeftishBrit May 2012 #1
Yes, George Osborne is an amazing idiot. cthulu2016 May 2012 #2
I bitterly regret voting for Clegg Prophet 451 May 2012 #11
Funny how the right has gone from deficits-do-not-matter to deficits-worse-than-terrorism. tabatha May 2012 #3
Absolutely AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #8
Not stupid, this is boilerplate Neo-Liberal Corporatist ideology. Odin2005 May 2012 #4
Yes, they want "austerity" because it benefits their pocket books. nt ladjf May 2012 #5
Well, he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer, mr blur May 2012 #6
Holding office doesn't require intelligence nor honesty. See Bachmann, Palin, et cetera. Gregorian May 2012 #7
His job prior to politics was Mutiny In Heaven May 2012 #9
He's not stupid, he's evil Prophet 451 May 2012 #10
They often go hand in hand cthulu2016 May 2012 #12
He will NOT dismantle the NHS FunkyLeprechaun May 2012 #17
He's started handing it over to private companies already Prophet 451 May 2012 #19
To be fair, the internal market has been part of the English NHS for years. MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #20
True, but... Prophet 451 May 2012 #26
It's not for me to dictate NHS policy in England. MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #27
Of course it's ideological Prophet 451 May 2012 #28
He also went to university for free. That didn't stop him upping the fees. LeftishBrit May 2012 #33
Why is this post being taken seriously? FunkyLeprechaun May 2012 #13
Perhaps you're a conservative who favors marriage equality cthulu2016 May 2012 #14
I'm actually not a conservative FunkyLeprechaun May 2012 #16
Cameron's cuts have hurt Mutiny In Heaven May 2012 #15
Cameron's cuts have hurt EVERYONE FunkyLeprechaun May 2012 #18
I apologize. I shouldn't have been political earlier cthulu2016 May 2012 #22
That's a myth Prophet 451 May 2012 #23
Gordon Brown did NOT leave that note LeftishBrit May 2012 #34
"disproportionately affects those with mental health issues" Prophet 451 May 2012 #24
I agree that all our political party leaders are relatively liberal on social issues LeftishBrit May 2012 #35
I think that is the general consensus about Cameron. He is merely a tool who does what sabrina 1 May 2012 #21
I question some of your assumptions Prometheus Bound May 2012 #25
Probably disorganized, but i'll try cthulu2016 May 2012 #29
Thanks for the very thorough reply. Prometheus Bound May 2012 #30
So deficit reduction produces confidence? It's important that markets are confident? Cali_Democrat May 2012 #31
URRK! cthulu2016 May 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The British Prime Ministe...»Reply #22