Chuck Schumer’s Disingenuous Iran Deal Argument

[geek tragedy]

38. Ah, the dishonest rightwing claim that the agreement is bad for Israel's security, and that

those who oppose it care more about Israel's security than do people who support it.

Other rightwing arguments you employ include:

1) that one's interpretations of "death to America" are germane to whether nuclear inspections would be effective;
2) that those supporting the deal assume that Iran will moderate--no, the inspections and monitoring are there because it's assumed they won't moderate
3) the concerns about Iran skirting could be considered honest if (a) people like Schemer didn't outright lie and distort the content of the agreement and (b) their proposal--no agreement--means no monitoring and no inspections and no reduction in enriched uranium or centrifuges, with Iran getting a good deal of the international sanctions lifted

You are fooling no one as to why you joined 2 months ago and have done nothing but recite word for word what the PNAC/AIPAC crowd claim.

An honest Democrat would find discomfort in siding with:

Dick Cheney
George W Bush
Ted Cruz
Donald Trump
Benjamin Netanyahu

vs Barack Obama, John Kerry, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton on the most important war and peace issue of the past decade, and perhaps the next 20 years.