General Discussion

Martin Eden

(15,622 posts)

43. There's a difference between "concerns about this deal" ...

Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:58 PM

Aug 2015

... and LIES ABOUT THIS DEAL.

Do you agree there should be an open honest debate about this deal?

If so, then it is necessary to point out lies and condemn the liars who would sabotage the debate by spreading falsehoods.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chuck Schumer�s Disingenuous Iran Deal Argument [View all] geek tragedy Aug 2015 OP

This is really good, thanks. n/t MBS Aug 2015 #1

Schumer swallowed the Republican/Bibi treachery and feces whole and pronounced it delicious! Try some? Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #2

Amazing 6chars Aug 2015 #3

Well, there is that little objection by some folks about lying about the agreement and pretending Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #6

Do you think the Democratic Party needs to do a purge? 6chars Aug 2015 #8

Nobody's going to mistake Wall Street Chuck for a true liberal. marmar Aug 2015 #14

no true liberals have opposed it to date geek tragedy Aug 2015 #16

one could come up with the opposite conclusion 6chars Aug 2015 #25

Only if one assumes that supporting a president of his own party is just as geek tragedy Aug 2015 #26

"I will obey my Commander-in-Chief" 6chars Aug 2015 #30

you are confused again. No one here gave those voting against Obama on the TPP geek tragedy Aug 2015 #31

ther are many interpretations 6chars Aug 2015 #35

Ah, the dishonest rightwing claim that the agreement is bad for Israel's security, and that geek tragedy Aug 2015 #38

You know that's not what I said 6chars Aug 2015 #40

forget loyalty and consider honesty karynnj Aug 2015 #32

There's a difference between "concerns about this deal" ... Martin Eden Aug 2015 #43

You see dear, it's like this... R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #10

Sorry if I like to think for myself 6chars Aug 2015 #13

Schemer didn't do any thinking about the merits of the agreement. geek tragedy Aug 2015 #15

that kind of caricature 6chars Aug 2015 #20

and those RWers are the ones Schemer listens to on foreign policy nt geek tragedy Aug 2015 #23

probably not true 6chars Aug 2015 #24

funny, you only raise issues of decorum when it's neoconservative hawks geek tragedy Aug 2015 #27

i am somewhat bothered by lack of decorum 6chars Aug 2015 #29

What's the alternative to this treaty beside war? R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #17

there are usually more than two alternatives 6chars Aug 2015 #21

"maybe it would lead to war and maybe not" What an astute analysis. Not. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #34

I remember the last time a President seemed so certain on a military matter 6chars Aug 2015 #37

Where that's where you have it terribly wrong. It's a diplomatic matter, silly. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #41

I hope you are right. 6chars Aug 2015 #42

I did think for myself, extensively. That's why I believe Schumer is DANGEROUSLY wrong Tom Rinaldo Aug 2015 #33

That's fair. 6chars Aug 2015 #39

Schumer believed that horrible ad RockaFowler Aug 2015 #4

Schemer's decision was not based on the actual agreement. geek tragedy Aug 2015 #7

I love your nickname for him RockaFowler Aug 2015 #18

it's not original, but certainly fitting nt geek tragedy Aug 2015 #19

More... R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #5

Schumer can't be allowed to slide through on this Tom Rinaldo Aug 2015 #9

Not to mention he thinks passing the ACA was a mistake. geek tragedy Aug 2015 #11

I couldn't agree more. Hubert Flottz Aug 2015 #12

There is no way to stop Iran's nuclear program militarily jeff47 Aug 2015 #22

There is not one member of Congress who opposed Bush's war who is also geek tragedy Aug 2015 #28

#2 isn't going to happen either Martin Eden Aug 2015 #44

Iran is roughly 4 times the size of Iraq. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #45

k&R... spanone Aug 2015 #36

Not all Democrats are created equally. Scuba Aug 2015 #46