Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chuck Schumer’s Disingenuous Iran Deal Argument [View all]Martin Eden
(15,645 posts)44. #2 isn't going to happen either
We might bomb them, but invading & occupying Iran would be orders of magnitude more difficult & costly than the fiasco in Iraq. Iran is a much larger country with a more cohesive national identity, whereas Iraq was ready-made to splinter into the three major factions (Shia, Sunni, Kurd).
A much larger force would be necessary for an effective long term suppression of the Iranian people. Even if a Repuke wins the presidency, I sincerely doubt there is public support for that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Schumer swallowed the Republican/Bibi treachery and feces whole and pronounced it delicious! Try some?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#2
Well, there is that little objection by some folks about lying about the agreement and pretending
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#6
Only if one assumes that supporting a president of his own party is just as
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#26
you are confused again. No one here gave those voting against Obama on the TPP
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#31
Ah, the dishonest rightwing claim that the agreement is bad for Israel's security, and that
geek tragedy
Aug 2015
#38
"maybe it would lead to war and maybe not" What an astute analysis. Not.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2015
#34
Where that's where you have it terribly wrong. It's a diplomatic matter, silly.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Aug 2015
#41
I did think for myself, extensively. That's why I believe Schumer is DANGEROUSLY wrong
Tom Rinaldo
Aug 2015
#33