Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange Expected to Be Set Free Next Week [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)45. you don't know shit about how the Swedes do things
While the Assange case has stagnated, 44 other people have been questioned by Swedish authorities in the UK during the same period.
https://justice4assange.com/
https://justice4assange.com/
If the Swedes 'were not going to waste their time', why attempt to interview him shortly before the statute of limitations expires? This was never about the 'allegations', it was a trap from the start and still is. Apart from that, the false allegations have been and are still being used to slander Assange. Still, he was and still is able to do a million times more for our collective countries than all those punks badmouthing him in the media combined.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Different members of his so-called "legal team" say different things at different times
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#89
They were given five months to question him in the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#124
Maybe if they had something like "evidence" or corroborated , consistent testimony under oath,
bvar22
Aug 2015
#177
And there you have the answer for why Assange has been in the Ecudorean embassy for 3 years. nt
truebluegreen
Aug 2015
#57
Were I in the UK, I should be most pleased to see him tried under the Bail Act
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#5
All the whistleblowers convicted over the past 15 years need be pardoned. They are heroes.
Dont call me Shirley
Aug 2015
#69
If the US really wants him, they will have the British police arrest him when he leaves the embassy.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2015
#8
The fourth charge, which is for rape, does not expire for another five years
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#10
IIRC one of his lawyers has said JA can't leave the embassy until the UK promises
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#96
You're not hot at all. You claimed that rich people don't go to jail. I proved you wrong.
MADem
Aug 2015
#188
I don't believe I have engaged in "slut shaming" or naming any specific person a "liar".
bvar22
Aug 2015
#196
Prosecutors were given ample opportunity to question him at the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#127
He actually agreed to go to Sweden IF they agreed not to extradite him to the U.S. They refused.
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#134
So you display your ignorance of Swedish legal procedures and defend rape.
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#58
Looking forward to Wikileaks exposing more MIC dirt in a vicious decade long vendetta. nt
Zorra
Aug 2015
#20
His lawyers are probably gambling that the Swedes won't have enough evidence to prove it. (nt)
jeff47
Aug 2015
#95
The idea was that once under trial in Sweden, the USA would file a request for his extradition
Betty Karlson
Aug 2015
#140
Yes. Certainly, we know black people don't appear to have a right to life, liberty
closeupready
Aug 2015
#162