Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange Expected to Be Set Free Next Week [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)132. This is ALTERNET, and they sometimes don't tell the truth.
We're not quite in "Karl Rove Indicted" territory, but I want to see something from a real paper. It could be true, and he could be leaving the embassy (which is simply a small converted flat) to have a conversation with the British legal system while getting medical treatment --or maybe Ecuador will just push him out and get their back office back.
But isn't he a British bail jumper? And doesn't he owe a LOT of people--some pissed off--a LOT of money? His troubles are not over, I don't think.
I found this article, and it's not quite so sanguine as that rosy Alternet piece:
.....The WikiLeaks publisher flummoxed the international media on Monday by telling reporters in London that he will soon be leaving his refuge in Ecuadors London embassy, but not elaborating on how long soon might be or the circumstances in which he will end his diplomatic asylum.
I can confirm I am leaving the Ecuadorian embassy soon, Mr Assange said at a joint press conference with Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino.
Mr Assanges remarks were preceded by a flood of speculation by international media and on Twitter that health problems were about to force him to surrender to British police.
Mr Assange acknowledged that his health had deteriorated during two years of confinement in Ecuador's embassy, but said that his eventual departure would be not for the reason you might think - an apparent reference to media reports that he has developed a significant heart ailment.
In a subsequent interview with Fairfax Media, however, Mr Assange clarified his remarks by referring to what he described as a range of important legal developments in the United Kingdom, especially the British governments decision to opt out of the European Arrest Warrant system under which Sweden sought his extradition to be questioned about sexual assault and rape allegations first raised in August 2010.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/julian-assange-plans-to-leave-ecuadorian-embassy-a-free-man-after-changes-to-uk-laws-20140818-105kqu.html#ixzz3ievbuhgN
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Different members of his so-called "legal team" say different things at different times
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#89
They were given five months to question him in the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#124
Maybe if they had something like "evidence" or corroborated , consistent testimony under oath,
bvar22
Aug 2015
#177
And there you have the answer for why Assange has been in the Ecudorean embassy for 3 years. nt
truebluegreen
Aug 2015
#57
Were I in the UK, I should be most pleased to see him tried under the Bail Act
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#5
All the whistleblowers convicted over the past 15 years need be pardoned. They are heroes.
Dont call me Shirley
Aug 2015
#69
If the US really wants him, they will have the British police arrest him when he leaves the embassy.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2015
#8
The fourth charge, which is for rape, does not expire for another five years
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#10
IIRC one of his lawyers has said JA can't leave the embassy until the UK promises
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#96
You're not hot at all. You claimed that rich people don't go to jail. I proved you wrong.
MADem
Aug 2015
#188
I don't believe I have engaged in "slut shaming" or naming any specific person a "liar".
bvar22
Aug 2015
#196
Prosecutors were given ample opportunity to question him at the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#127
He actually agreed to go to Sweden IF they agreed not to extradite him to the U.S. They refused.
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#134
So you display your ignorance of Swedish legal procedures and defend rape.
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#58
Looking forward to Wikileaks exposing more MIC dirt in a vicious decade long vendetta. nt
Zorra
Aug 2015
#20
His lawyers are probably gambling that the Swedes won't have enough evidence to prove it. (nt)
jeff47
Aug 2015
#95
The idea was that once under trial in Sweden, the USA would file a request for his extradition
Betty Karlson
Aug 2015
#140
Yes. Certainly, we know black people don't appear to have a right to life, liberty
closeupready
Aug 2015
#162