Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange Expected to Be Set Free Next Week [View all]markpkessinger
(8,919 posts)134. He actually agreed to go to Sweden IF they agreed not to extradite him to the U.S. They refused.
A statement by his defense committee:
Statement Julian Assange Legal Defence Committee
Assange has not been charged in Sweden or the UK.
The US Department of Justice is trying to prosecute him for "espionage".
This is the reason he was given asylum by Ecuador.
He has been confined to the premises of Ecuadors embassy in London, unable to see his family, because the UK and Sweden refuse him safe passage to Ecuador.
A collapse of the Swedish preliminary investigation would in no way allow him to leave the embassy of Ecuador.
He cannot leave, because of the risk of arrest by the United Kingdom on behalf of the United States.
The UK has stated its intention to arrest Assange even if the Swedish preliminary investigation is withdrawn.
In no way has Assange or Ecuador obstructed the progression of the Swedish investigation.
Swedish authorities have for three years been offered the option of taking Assanges statement at the embassy, and they have refused.
Assange has also offered to go to Sweden if the authorities agreed not to transfer him to the United States, and they have refused.
This failure has been rebuked by the highest court in Sweden.
It has been condemned by 59 human rights organisations in a submission to the United Nations.
While the Assange case has stagnated, 44 other people have been questioned by Swedish authorities in the UK during the same period.
By failing to take Assanges statement at the embassy, Swedish authorities have deprived him of the right to answer false allegations against him that have been widely circulated in the media, but for which he has not been charged.
If the case expires, that deprivation will become permanent, and no formal resolution will be available.
Therefore while this particularly shambolic episode in Swedish justice may be coming to a close, the denial of Julian Assanges liberty continues.
Gavin MacFadyen
Assange has not been charged in Sweden or the UK.
The US Department of Justice is trying to prosecute him for "espionage".
This is the reason he was given asylum by Ecuador.
He has been confined to the premises of Ecuadors embassy in London, unable to see his family, because the UK and Sweden refuse him safe passage to Ecuador.
A collapse of the Swedish preliminary investigation would in no way allow him to leave the embassy of Ecuador.
He cannot leave, because of the risk of arrest by the United Kingdom on behalf of the United States.
The UK has stated its intention to arrest Assange even if the Swedish preliminary investigation is withdrawn.
In no way has Assange or Ecuador obstructed the progression of the Swedish investigation.
Swedish authorities have for three years been offered the option of taking Assanges statement at the embassy, and they have refused.
Assange has also offered to go to Sweden if the authorities agreed not to transfer him to the United States, and they have refused.
This failure has been rebuked by the highest court in Sweden.
It has been condemned by 59 human rights organisations in a submission to the United Nations.
While the Assange case has stagnated, 44 other people have been questioned by Swedish authorities in the UK during the same period.
By failing to take Assanges statement at the embassy, Swedish authorities have deprived him of the right to answer false allegations against him that have been widely circulated in the media, but for which he has not been charged.
If the case expires, that deprivation will become permanent, and no formal resolution will be available.
Therefore while this particularly shambolic episode in Swedish justice may be coming to a close, the denial of Julian Assanges liberty continues.
Gavin MacFadyen
But hey, by all means, continue to ignore the obvious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Different members of his so-called "legal team" say different things at different times
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#89
They were given five months to question him in the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#124
Maybe if they had something like "evidence" or corroborated , consistent testimony under oath,
bvar22
Aug 2015
#177
And there you have the answer for why Assange has been in the Ecudorean embassy for 3 years. nt
truebluegreen
Aug 2015
#57
Were I in the UK, I should be most pleased to see him tried under the Bail Act
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#5
All the whistleblowers convicted over the past 15 years need be pardoned. They are heroes.
Dont call me Shirley
Aug 2015
#69
If the US really wants him, they will have the British police arrest him when he leaves the embassy.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2015
#8
The fourth charge, which is for rape, does not expire for another five years
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#10
IIRC one of his lawyers has said JA can't leave the embassy until the UK promises
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#96
You're not hot at all. You claimed that rich people don't go to jail. I proved you wrong.
MADem
Aug 2015
#188
I don't believe I have engaged in "slut shaming" or naming any specific person a "liar".
bvar22
Aug 2015
#196
Prosecutors were given ample opportunity to question him at the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#127
He actually agreed to go to Sweden IF they agreed not to extradite him to the U.S. They refused.
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#134
So you display your ignorance of Swedish legal procedures and defend rape.
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#58
Looking forward to Wikileaks exposing more MIC dirt in a vicious decade long vendetta. nt
Zorra
Aug 2015
#20
His lawyers are probably gambling that the Swedes won't have enough evidence to prove it. (nt)
jeff47
Aug 2015
#95
The idea was that once under trial in Sweden, the USA would file a request for his extradition
Betty Karlson
Aug 2015
#140
Yes. Certainly, we know black people don't appear to have a right to life, liberty
closeupready
Aug 2015
#162