Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Julian Assange Expected to Be Set Free Next Week [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)148. Sure, they will 'attempt' to charge him with
Last edited Thu Aug 13, 2015, 09:30 AM - Edit history (1)
whatever trumped up BS they can come up with - in Sweden, a woman throwing herself at you becomes 'rape', in the US, publishing classified information from whistleblowers becomes 'data theft'.
The Swedes as well as the Americans are more than happy, of course, if they don't have to make their case in court. That doesn't mean they won't find stooges willing to do the dirty work. But why go to the trouble as long as he is confined and under constant observation?
"Mr Assange, who has been living at the Ecuadorian embassy in London for over three years after being granted political asylum, said he was "extremely disappointed" that the Swedish prosecutor has managed to "avoid" hearing his side of the story entirely."
... Labour peer and human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy, a member of the Assange legal team, said: "Why in all those five years did the Swedish prosecution authorities fail to come to London to question Assange, as was repeatedly offered?
"Julian Assange has spent more time incarcerated in the small rooms of the embassy, with no access to fresh air or exercise and contrary to international law, than he could ever spend in a Swedish prison on these allegations.
"The remaining allegation is just as unlikely to lead to conviction. The question remains whether we are dealing with incompetence or bad faith or an agenda set by other considerations. I remain unconvinced that this prosecution has been about securing justice for women."
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/julian-assange-hits-out-at-swedish-prosecutor-as-some-allegations-dropped-31448246.html
... Labour peer and human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy, a member of the Assange legal team, said: "Why in all those five years did the Swedish prosecution authorities fail to come to London to question Assange, as was repeatedly offered?
"Julian Assange has spent more time incarcerated in the small rooms of the embassy, with no access to fresh air or exercise and contrary to international law, than he could ever spend in a Swedish prison on these allegations.
"The remaining allegation is just as unlikely to lead to conviction. The question remains whether we are dealing with incompetence or bad faith or an agenda set by other considerations. I remain unconvinced that this prosecution has been about securing justice for women."
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/julian-assange-hits-out-at-swedish-prosecutor-as-some-allegations-dropped-31448246.html

Human rights lawyer Baroness Helena Kennedy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Different members of his so-called "legal team" say different things at different times
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#89
They were given five months to question him in the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#124
Maybe if they had something like "evidence" or corroborated , consistent testimony under oath,
bvar22
Aug 2015
#177
And there you have the answer for why Assange has been in the Ecudorean embassy for 3 years. nt
truebluegreen
Aug 2015
#57
Were I in the UK, I should be most pleased to see him tried under the Bail Act
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#5
All the whistleblowers convicted over the past 15 years need be pardoned. They are heroes.
Dont call me Shirley
Aug 2015
#69
If the US really wants him, they will have the British police arrest him when he leaves the embassy.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2015
#8
The fourth charge, which is for rape, does not expire for another five years
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#10
IIRC one of his lawyers has said JA can't leave the embassy until the UK promises
struggle4progress
Aug 2015
#96
You're not hot at all. You claimed that rich people don't go to jail. I proved you wrong.
MADem
Aug 2015
#188
I don't believe I have engaged in "slut shaming" or naming any specific person a "liar".
bvar22
Aug 2015
#196
Prosecutors were given ample opportunity to question him at the Ecuadorian embassy . . .
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#127
He actually agreed to go to Sweden IF they agreed not to extradite him to the U.S. They refused.
markpkessinger
Aug 2015
#134
So you display your ignorance of Swedish legal procedures and defend rape.
GoldenEagle16
Aug 2015
#58
Looking forward to Wikileaks exposing more MIC dirt in a vicious decade long vendetta. nt
Zorra
Aug 2015
#20
His lawyers are probably gambling that the Swedes won't have enough evidence to prove it. (nt)
jeff47
Aug 2015
#95
The idea was that once under trial in Sweden, the USA would file a request for his extradition
Betty Karlson
Aug 2015
#140
Yes. Certainly, we know black people don't appear to have a right to life, liberty
closeupready
Aug 2015
#162