General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thank you Thom Hartman for your perspective on the Marissa Johnson diatribe [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)justifying what they did, the three protestors, this discussion was about the Swiftboating that came later. Using the protest as a means to smear Sen Sanders. The smear was not intended to advance the cause of BLM but to disparage Sen Sanders. The smear was a low blow (maybe Rovian) but that's what is expected for someone that dares challenge the billionaires.
For the record I have always liked Van Jones and understood why Obama, the conservative would fire him. I even agree with the article you posted. I support BLM. I just thought it very strange that BLM would target the most liberal candidate of all first. While H. Clinton is having $2,700 an invite, cups of tea with the 1%, Sen Sanders is standing before larger and larger audiences of the 99%. Have Clinton or any other candidate put forth a plan to solve the 200 years of racism?
I know that the billionaires don't want Sen Sanders. Do you disagree? I know that the billionaires want H. Clinton (Goldman-Sachs said as much and she is expected to raise close to $2,000,000,000 dollars from the billionaires in an attempt to buy the election).
Why would a Democrat choose the side of Goldman-Sachs and the Wall Street Gangsters?