General Discussion

Are_grits_groceries

(17,139 posts)

2. Not arguing about the damage comparison.

Sat Aug 15, 2015, 08:24 AM

Aug 2015

Your post proved my point. You have pointed out several items that you consider to be wrong. There is validity there. However, I did not intentionally write any of those phrases to offend or to avoid an issue.
This same post was dissected elsewhere with some of the same points, new points, and some that do not agee with you. It's a no win situation.

I sincerely asked a question about helping which was not addressed at all.

And as a point of personal order from me, liberal white supremacist is white supremacist to me. Perhaps there is another phrase for that? Perhaps not.

I'm out. Period.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My thoughts on #BLM and the intense feelings it has aroused: [View all] Are_grits_groceries Aug 2015 OP

There has been little damage done compared to the value of raising of conscious of visible minority issues. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #1

Not arguing about the damage comparison. Are_grits_groceries Aug 2015 #2

You're moving the goal posts. CJCRANE Aug 2015 #3

Just my personal opinion, I am not offended by the abbreviation of the phrases and terms, more like disappointed. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #4

At least you're asking the question tech3149 Aug 2015 #5

as long as allies are labeled white supremacist, nashville_brook Aug 2015 #6

Precisely. Lizzie Poppet Aug 2015 #7