Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,581 posts)

1. They may pay the USPS a fee to have the box there.

Sun May 20, 2012, 10:34 AM

May 2012

I agree with what you seem to be saying, it doesn't make sense in the long run to allow your competitors easy access to your customers.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FedEx vs USPS [View all] SHRED May 2012 OP

They may pay the USPS a fee to have the box there. Denninmi May 2012 #1

Convenience. Why not have UPS, FedEx, and USPS all at one spot? NYC_SKP May 2012 #3

Convenience, yes SoutherDem May 2012 #11

We have one too. CrispyQ May 2012 #4

The term "tradeoff" is an alien concept to some people. lpbk2713 May 2012 #6

Good on you! nt tsuki May 2012 #12

Fedex and the USPS are involved in an alliance... PoliticAverse May 2012 #5

Correct. Translation: They are in bed together. RC May 2012 #8

This has been going on for years tularetom May 2012 #7

I heard an interview with the Post Master General SoutherDem May 2012 #10