Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
24. Yes, because it is so progressive to...
Sun May 20, 2012, 12:37 PM
May 2012

Make people spend money to paint over your spray paint. Learn something called EMPATHY and think about whomever lives in the house!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow. Couldn't be any simpler than that. Well done! nt gateley May 2012 #1
I and I'm sure many others have had that thought before IDemo May 2012 #2
Seriously. intheflow May 2012 #3
'xactly. TahitiNut May 2012 #36
Hey, TN! intheflow May 2012 #39
Hey, itf! TahitiNut May 2012 #40
I hope that is an empty building, otherwise he's a vandal. Odin2005 May 2012 #4
I would guess it is unoccupied since the electrical meter is removed. Arctic Dave May 2012 #5
That makes it unoccupyAble. WingDinger May 2012 #10
And that matters ... how? HuckleB May 2012 #8
I certainly would not want anyone spray-painting on my house. Odin2005 May 2012 #14
Get a clue. Fantastic Anarchist May 2012 #18
Yes, because it is so progressive to... Odin2005 May 2012 #24
You mean it's bad to make the big banks pay to stop people from telling the truth? HuckleB May 2012 #62
I think the point of the graffiti is to point out that it's an unoccupied house lunatica May 2012 #27
that's why I was saying that I hope it is unoccupied. Odin2005 May 2012 #28
I carried a sign with a similar message in the Occupy portion of the Rose Bowl Parade JDPriestly May 2012 #30
Who's spray painting your house? HuckleB May 2012 #61
No, he's socially aware. Fantastic Anarchist May 2012 #17
It's not about rules, it's about empathy. Odin2005 May 2012 #25
Whether the house is empty or not intheflow May 2012 #21
If it is bank-owned I don;t care who fucks with it. Odin2005 May 2012 #23
If it is bank-owned, it is owned pretty much by the Fed and by their depositors JDPriestly May 2012 #31
There are more abandoned foreclosed buildings in Florida than there are homeless people in the US Recursion May 2012 #6
Maybe we should impose a special tax on houses while they are not being lived in. JDPriestly May 2012 #32
Not exactly novel, no. HuckleB May 2012 #7
Now if someone would just buy pipoman May 2012 #9
.. rational_democrat May 2012 #11
True, it always infuriates me and I always point that out. freshwest May 2012 #12
Thanks for crediting us with being idiots. n/t JayhawkSD May 2012 #13
reallllly????? you think none of us has thought this before? wow. niyad May 2012 #15
Actually it never gets anywhere because someone actually pipoman May 2012 #19
They only own them because our laws allow them to own them Cleita May 2012 #22
Flawed as it may be, I opt for pipoman May 2012 #33
Yes, but should they let property go vacant from greed? Cleita May 2012 #35
Supply and demand don't lower pipoman May 2012 #41
Did you ever have a course in economics? Cleita May 2012 #42
Why didn't you answer my question? pipoman May 2012 #44
I thought I did. The 10% on top of the economic pyramid, should pay for it like they used to Cleita May 2012 #46
So then, do we agree or disagree? pipoman May 2012 #49
Yes, like in any business, if you can't make it work, get out. Cleita May 2012 #50
No.. pipoman May 2012 #53
Well, a lot of people overpaid for their rental real estate when Cleita May 2012 #54
Nobody has a right to pipoman May 2012 #56
Now you are talking. Cleita May 2012 #59
The flaw in this case is the hoarding of wealth (land in this case) by too few people. U4ikLefty May 2012 #55
Who, pray tell, do you speak of? pipoman May 2012 #57
Investing and speculation used to come with risk, not Cleita May 2012 #60
Anarchism 101 Fantastic Anarchist May 2012 #16
But vandalizing other people's possessions is vandalism. Odin2005 May 2012 #26
I see what you did there. Quantess May 2012 #20
Not just a fail - an utter spectacular epic fail. Initech May 2012 #29
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT May 2012 #34
The GOP is building housing for the homeless as fast as they can. TahitiNut May 2012 #37
1 in 7 houses are empty. 1 in 402 Americans are homeless. just1voice May 2012 #38
makes me think some asshole has a can of spray paint Scout May 2012 #43
There is graffiti and there is graffiti art pipoman May 2012 #45
So you would rather a gang banger with some creative colored Cleita May 2012 #47
Wow.. pipoman May 2012 #48
What was the point of your post then? n/t Cleita May 2012 #51
Simply that the OP mischaracterized pipoman May 2012 #52
This what happens when you make Shankapotomus May 2012 #58
How would that practically WORK? ErikJ May 2012 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Graffiti Artist Had ...»Reply #24