Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
47. Here's a good example from real life: AIG sold credit default swaps against
Sun May 20, 2012, 12:51 PM
May 2012

the possiblity that bonds on mortgages would suffer defaults if the real estate bubble popped. Of course, few at the time ever thought that real estate prices would stop ascending (despite the fact that the real estate boom-bust cycle occurs almost as regularly as clockwork).

So AIG was legally required to pay out if the real estate bubble burst. But (and here's the big BUT): AIG was not legally required to maintain adequate reserves against the possibility that the real estate bubble would burst. So when the real estate bubble burst and AIG was required to pay out on all the CDSes it had sold, it did not have the funds to pay out. Instead, the taxpayers had to bail it out. Note that a sizable portion of those bailout funds were direct pass-throughs to Goldman Sachs (which had bought massive amounts of AIG's CDSes), even though Goldman Sachs had little or no insurablitiy interest (meaning GS held no underlying assets that required it to hedge with CDSes).

If AIG could not pay off on its CDSes, then GS would go belly-up because AIG did not pay. If GS went belly up, that might trigger the entire house of cards to come crashing down.

That's as near as I can come to providing a simple explanation of how a crash could occur.

Clearly, the Have-Mores are having a heyday. 99th_Monkey May 2012 #1
Economics class won't do it for ya jmowreader May 2012 #2
So we've created some kind of financial chimera whose DNA we can't even decode? Zalatix May 2012 #3
Precisely jmowreader May 2012 #30
Yep, I have a friend with a masters in math from MIT. He sat down and explained them to me stevenleser May 2012 #33
Banned? Oh no don't do that, just because we silly mortals cannot understand it. Zalatix May 2012 #34
Wendy Gramm TahitiNut May 2012 #4
Ding, Ding, Ding! salin May 2012 #8
"Almost"? sendero May 2012 #12
Not there yet, but have a good credit union salin May 2012 #28
"...money isn't earning much of anything." unkachuck May 2012 #51
What do you mean "no one knows what the hell they are"? FarCenter May 2012 #19
Pricey read that first one. laundry_queen May 2012 #27
Okay, Sayajit Das knows what the hell they are jmowreader May 2012 #31
That is a powerful metaphor, I hope you will consider building an OP coalition_unwilling May 2012 #43
Nor were the people whose houses were flattened... jmowreader May 2012 #50
4700 PAGES!!! That's 3x as long as War and Peace!!! Zalatix May 2012 #35
According to Malcolm Gladwell, it takes 10,000 hours to master something FarCenter May 2012 #39
Actually, the CFTC does not have regulatory authority over many of the coalition_unwilling May 2012 #42
Yes, I'd like to see the derivitives market regulated by the Nevada Gaming Commission Jack Rabbit May 2012 #48
There's a more important NCG rule jmowreader May 2012 #49
You're right. That is more important. Jack Rabbit May 2012 #54
Yup, and it needs to be declared void for the fraud that it is. Waiting For Everyman May 2012 #5
Indeed. This is nothing more than Monopoly money. hifiguy May 2012 #22
The key here is to understand that "notional value" isn't real. FBaggins May 2012 #6
Not only that.. sendero May 2012 #13
That's certainly correct. FBaggins May 2012 #15
I'll have to disagree . sendero May 2012 #16
There are two problems actually. Your problem is one of them, in that coalition_unwilling May 2012 #44
Magic Economics. Nice work if you can get it. TrollBuster9090 May 2012 #7
Ah, I see. I wasn't getting it because it's not even real. Zalatix May 2012 #9
The funny thing is, every empire of note, MadHound May 2012 #10
Rome is a bad example. DetlefK May 2012 #14
and the main chunk of money funding this empire is pillage magical thyme May 2012 #26
Rome is a bad example there too bhikkhu May 2012 #32
At least the Roman empire created some great art and philosophy that coalition_unwilling May 2012 #45
that sounds vaguely similar to onethatcares May 2012 #38
+1 Blue_Tires May 2012 #36
What's the difference between this and counterfeiting money? Please explain! DetlefK May 2012 #11
You are conflating currency (a physical form that money takes) and money (the coalition_unwilling May 2012 #46
Warren Buffett was sounding the alarm on derivatives way back in 2002 when PA Democrat May 2012 #17
No. Notional is not "worth" econoclast May 2012 #18
The other reason that the total notional is so high is that it is cumulative FarCenter May 2012 #20
Only if you think tomorrow's Powerball drawing is worth 2 Quadrillion dmallind May 2012 #21
Your analogy doesn't work because they divide the winnings for Powerball Taitertots May 2012 #25
isn't that 1.2 gazillion? nt Javaman May 2012 #23
Actually, it might be a Brazillion. nt eppur_se_muova May 2012 #24
Might as well be Triskellian Quatloons aint_no_life_nowhere May 2012 #29
Quick... before this thread goes south... Bigmack May 2012 #37
It will fall when it can't grow any more. bemildred May 2012 #40
Here, this might do it: bemildred May 2012 #41
Here's a good example from real life: AIG sold credit default swaps against coalition_unwilling May 2012 #47
It's stupendously simple Zanzoobar May 2012 #52
I think it's a very big deal indeed. pa28 May 2012 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wait, the Derivatives mar...»Reply #47