Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

patrice

(47,992 posts)
26. Your assumption about exactly how I am a pacifist is rather ... cliche. My responsibilities for
Sun May 20, 2012, 12:23 PM
May 2012

who/what I am are my own, not something you can define, and they always have and always will necessitate action in ways that you do not, nor will ever, know, so your zero sum assessment of that is evidence of your own somewhat aggressive, not so peaceful, ground. The difference between us is that I admit that and you don't.

"It essentially translates to ..." YOU. What follows is an fundamentally hierarchical and, ergo, power-based authoritarian position that you are trying to sell as somekind of universal understanding of anyone in my position . . . without even beginning with a question to an individual in order to rationally validate whether you are even remotely correct, or perhaps, just perhaps, WRONG.

BTW, you should disregard all Buddhism, since it's roots are found in the Bhagavad Gita, which is quite clear on the issue at question here, in Krishna's discussion with Arjuna before the great fratricidal war on the plains of Kuruksetra. You see, Buddhists are honest about what is happening, thus, they recognize that not everyone is so enlightened as to be outside of the struggle, not even you as your absolutist authoritarian driven reply so clearly demonstrates, TTE, "There is ONE truth about peace and that is MadHound's."

There is no right to self-determination, unless everyone, right or wrong, has that same right. Were it otherwise, we'd not be talking about rights, but privilege instead, a privilege that you apparently claim against all who disagree with your "essential" translation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, since the 2009 budget was Bush's budget, we can throw that out MadHound May 2012 #1
But, to be fair to the President... kentuck May 2012 #2
Well, Obama could have ended the wars the day he walked into office MadHound May 2012 #3
Realistically... kentuck May 2012 #4
I agree, it would have taken a few months to get everybody home, MadHound May 2012 #22
He's Commannder and Chief of the ARMED FORCES, Not. A. King. Do you think just maybe patrice May 2012 #9
He is Commander in Chief, MadHound May 2012 #23
Your assumption about exactly how I am a pacifist is rather ... cliche. My responsibilities for patrice May 2012 #26
You have to remember that Bush put the wars off budget, Obama put them into the budget. shraby May 2012 #5
+1. NT. Mc Mike May 2012 #7
Crucial point that's almost never talked about... Surya Gayatri May 2012 #10
Republicans are getting a lot of mileage out of this issue... kentuck May 2012 #12
It's funny hearing cons take a shine to big government when it comes to defense Populist_Prole May 2012 #13
Amongst their own... kentuck May 2012 #14
"Bastards are more slippery than a greased eel and have an answer for everything." Surya Gayatri May 2012 #21
Bushitler charged everything to the ground and still awaits the rain to settle it. lonestarnot May 2012 #15
What budget? TBMASE May 2012 #16
Not so, as far as the debt is concerned. dems_rightnow May 2012 #24
Discretionary spending is down. Federal employment is down. cthulu2016 May 2012 #6
No doubt, the recession is responsible for most of the debt... kentuck May 2012 #8
+1! n/t Surya Gayatri May 2012 #11
Two main reasons: Historically low taxes and historically low revenues to blame ErikJ May 2012 #17
Ask Romney what the debt would be if he took over from W. and how he would have handled the Dustlawyer May 2012 #18
18. Ask Romney what the debt would be if he took over from W. and how he would have handled the countrygirl Aug 2012 #29
Obama takes ownership of everything. He's not running. He's solving. Zax2me May 2012 #19
Bumpersticker answer: Blame Bush tax cuts and Bush Recession. ErikJ May 2012 #20
NONE - the Constitution gives Congress the purse strings. SmileyRose May 2012 #25
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #27
Some charts and graphs - Bush 85% Obama 15% underpants Aug 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How much total debt has B...»Reply #26