Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. Although I fully support genetic modification in agriculture, I oppose this bill.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 06:11 AM
Aug 2015

However, I do not support mandatory labeling either because the boundaries of what is, and is not, genetic modification is not well defined. From some perspectives all food is genetically modified. Furthermore, the Frankenfood arguments of the anti-GMO forces are exceptionally weak and are not backed up by the basic science. From many perspectives all the food we eat is genetically modified and science shows no boundary lines between what might be called natural and artificial modification. So the anti-GMO crowd is just plain wrong on some things.

On the other hand, one must ask the question, what is the purpose of this bill?

That alone is reason enough to oppose it, regardless of ones position on genetic modification.

So I support both genetic modification in agriculture and this thread.

R&K

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oppose Monsanto's Dream G...»Reply #2