Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Col. Wilkerson: If Americans Want Ground Forces To Fight ISIS, Let's Have A Draft [View all]avebury
(11,197 posts)34. Conscientious Objectors should have the right to demand
that their tax dollars not fund military funding (with the exception of the VA Hosiptials and programs to take care of the physically and emotionallly damaged members of the military. Imagine if conscientious objectors started across the country to refuse to pay taxes. That has the potential to be a huge mechanism of non-violent protest. What will the government if there was a massaive tax revolt over the issue of the military? Particularly if the volume of protestors far exceeded their capacity of the government to deal with them.
The Hobby Lobby ruling could be used to catapault the non-vioent, anti-military movement. Being anti-war, anti-military is just as much a part of a person's religious beliefs as being pro-life.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Col. Wilkerson: If Americans Want Ground Forces To Fight ISIS, Let's Have A Draft [View all]
KamaAina
Aug 2015
OP
But you know that the latter-day Trumps and Cheneys will find ways to weasel out of it
KamaAina
Aug 2015
#2
I do not think we will have wars like that again. Where exactly do you think we should
djean111
Aug 2015
#42
As long as only supporters of a ground war could be drafted. But that's not how it ever works.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#5
Considering the high quality of Middle Eastern armies, their taking Iraq wasn't surprising
jmowreader
Aug 2015
#99
The lower numbers don't make sense to me. The estimates of 100,000-200,000 do make sense
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#65
In Vietnam combat Infantry line units, draftees performed just as well as enlistees
pinboy3niner
Aug 2015
#61
No more than unsupported allegations are little more than what we may expect from you.
LanternWaste
Aug 2015
#70
DAMNED RIGHT! And THIS TIME, NO F-ING COLLEGE DEFERMENTS (aka 'other priorities')!
TrollBuster9090
Aug 2015
#15
Yes. Congress should (and is constitutionally obligated) to thoroughly debate
PatrickforO
Aug 2015
#21
These aren't deferments. These people serve in the military, just half a world away from combat.
hughee99
Aug 2015
#98
Why? Aren't we killing enough people of color and people who live in poverty now? n/
jtuck004
Aug 2015
#30
I Have No Problem With That... You Want To Go To War... Put EVERYBODY'S Skin In The Game...
WillyT
Aug 2015
#44
We ALREADY use robots to fight wars. They just don't mimic human looks.
TrollBuster9090
Aug 2015
#81
If YOU want to fight ISIS on the ground, I should not be forced to do the fighting! n/t
pampango
Aug 2015
#62
Peace Plan: Announce that you're going to draft all males between 18 and 50.
Elwood P Dowd
Aug 2015
#74
I'd support invading Iran, Syria and Iraq (again) if the following conditions were met:
hatrack
Aug 2015
#75
He is so right. We could stop ISIS if we could stop the flow of equipment to it.
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#84
And all those who support social security spending should be taxed extra to pay for it.
Donald Ian Rankin
Aug 2015
#94
If draft legislation had been included in the IWR it never would have passed
loyalsister
Aug 2015
#101