Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
Sun May 20, 2012, 06:08 PM May 2012

Question we should ask those who advocate for raising the retirement age. [View all]

I'm thinking this should be asked of all members of Congress, all think tank spokespeople, and ordinary citizens who repeat the meme, "We have to raise the retirement age."

Here it is:

How many people aged between 65 and 70 are you now employing?

And to DUers, I ask, how many of your employees or co-workers are aged between 65 and 70?

The US reports that there were 49,972,181 Americans aged 62 and over in 2010 and that the number had increased by 8,716,152 over the statistic in 2000.

http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bingo!!!!! Swede Atlanta May 2012 #1
Yes. Great statement, but I do want to clarify that those waiting for Medicare eligibility are, JDPriestly May 2012 #8
Most of our folks retire around 60 exboyfil May 2012 #2
The portion of people over 60 or 65 with arthritis, a history of back injuries, etc. is very high. JDPriestly May 2012 #6
we have a good friend who was forced to retire at age 62. He was a plumber for over 38 years CTyankee May 2012 #20
I tried to hire someone around 70 last year MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3
Have those 2 been with your company for a while? JDPriestly May 2012 #7
One about 6 years. The other I don't know how long. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #10
On the other hand...I know of a 70 year old still employed in a corporate office. RagAss May 2012 #4
Actually, they can touch him if he isn't working. But assuming your story is true, JDPriestly May 2012 #5
Of course they can "touch him" if he's not doing the work. Age is no protection for SharonAnn May 2012 #13
good question Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #9
Right - and the number of retirement aged people is just getting dana_b May 2012 #11
"They" say that there aren't enuf younger workers to fill the jobs in the future.` Honeycombe8 May 2012 #12
Please give a link to your source on Social Security running out of money in ten years. JDPriestly May 2012 #14
Here you go. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #17
In 2033, the youngest baby boomer will be 69 Major Nikon May 2012 #19
Soc Sec will start ridding itself of assets in 2020 to pay benefits. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #21
As it should Major Nikon May 2012 #22
social security is not paying things it was never set up for, like disability for younger people. HiPointDem May 2012 #15
Sorry, Grasshopper. You are unwise....and incorrect. Honeycombe8 May 2012 #16
I linked a social security administration page with the history of SS disability benefits -- which, HiPointDem May 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question we should ask th...