Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
20. Doesn't really work that way.
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 07:27 PM
Aug 2015

Most of the Giant Sequoia groves are located in the Sierra's ABOVE the dams that capture water for ag (there are a handful of reservoirs above them, but they are small and generally hold water for electricity generation and not ag). Moving water from the reservoirs to the groves would require the construction of some kind of system to pump the water uphill and back into the forests it originally ran out from. While it's theoretically possible, it would take years to build the infrastructure to pull it off.

And trucking the water back uphill to water them by hand doesn't really work either. There are tens of thousands of Giant Sequoia's spread out over around 70 groves, and the vast majority don't have trails or roads anywhere near them. Cutting new trails and roads would not only permanently destroy the wildland areas where the trees are located, but would encourage more visitors to the groves which would cause even more damage,

It's a nice idea, but it's unworkable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

California has lost over a million trees to the drought already. silverweb Aug 2015 #1
Agreed wholeheartedly! Fearless Aug 2015 #5
Trees are essential in so many ways. silverweb Aug 2015 #16
hi neighbor! shanti Aug 2015 #10
Hi, neighbor! silverweb Aug 2015 #15
No, the trees were quite healthy shanti Aug 2015 #19
Oh, that's awful about the trees! silverweb Aug 2015 #22
If we get any decent storms this year there will be limbs in the roads and worse. LeftyMom Aug 2015 #24
That's a wise decision for you, then. silverweb Aug 2015 #26
That would be truly tragic. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #2
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #3
This is the Sequoia gigantea in the Sierra, not the coastal Sequoia sempervirens Brother Buzz Aug 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author beltanefauve Aug 2015 #6
water from ag should be prioritized to saving them HFRN Aug 2015 #7
Won't happen. silverweb Aug 2015 #8
And it's not just Nestle Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #27
Yes, but Nestle is the biggest. silverweb Aug 2015 #28
No doubt that Nestle is the greediest Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #30
That's an understandable connection! silverweb Aug 2015 #31
Here are some ads for Crystal Geyser water in Japan Art_from_Ark Aug 2015 #32
That's true about our mountains. silverweb Aug 2015 #33
Doesn't really work that way. Xithras Aug 2015 #20
what about DC-10 watertankers then? HFRN Aug 2015 #23
Oh no. They are so beautiful. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #9
They'll be fine taught_me_patience Aug 2015 #11
They survived droughts far, far longer and worse than the current drought. They'll be fine. DesMoinesDem Aug 2015 #12
Here's an interesting read that provides more evidence documenting the megadroughts Brother Buzz Aug 2015 #13
It is at the very least a rare opportunity to see how the sequoias react to this stress. Gormy Cuss Aug 2015 #14
I'm worrying about the stress on LWolf Aug 2015 #17
Xposted to California group KamaAina Aug 2015 #18
It's wreaking havoc on my redwoods. Xithras Aug 2015 #21
Thats really sad about your yard marlakay Aug 2015 #25
Yes Xithras Aug 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The California Drought Is...»Reply #20