Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Does anyone know why, in the St. Paul's prep school rape case, the question [View all]
of whether or not the girl consented (she testified she said no, but the defense claims otherwise) is even an issue?
She was a 15 year-old freshman and the age of consent in Connecticut is 16. Owen Labrie, a senior at the time of the alleged rape, is three years older, and the law says you can't have sex with someone more than 2 years younger if that person is under 16.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/21/us/st-paul-school-rape-case-owen-labrie.html
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone know why, in the St. Paul's prep school rape case, the question [View all]
pnwmom
Aug 2015
OP
Wouldn't not having consent be an added charge to the statutory rape charge? I'd think so.
bettyellen
Aug 2015
#1
Yes, he is facing additional charges because prosecution is alleging that the 15 year old didn't
LisaL
Aug 2015
#2
He's 19 now. Where have you seen his age at the time? How do you know I'm wrong?
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#19
He is now 19. The alleged rape was a year ago, meaning he was 18, when girl was 15.
LisaL
Aug 2015
#14
But 3 years and 1 day is "more than" 3 years. How do you know he isn't more than 3 years older?
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#21
No, that's not called math. We use the term "18 year old" to be anyone who is at least
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#38
Person A: June 1, 1997. Person B: June 2, 2000. Person A is three years plus one day older,
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#47
Well, if that's 3 years and 1 day, presumably that is going to count as more than 3 years.
LisaL
Aug 2015
#16
Person A: August 1, 2000 Person B: August 2, 2003. Person A is 3 years and 1 day older.
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#42
He is 19 now, a year later. She is 16 now, a year later. It seems likely that there is a 3 year age
pnwmom
Aug 2015
#15