Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AOR

(692 posts)
71. Fair enough Steven clear explanation...
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 11:15 PM
Aug 2015

I can't speak for all brands of leftists but most will not take the threat of a Republican as a threat to the struggle. Leftists can't worry about that. The overriding responsibility of anti-capitalists (leftists) is to unyielding critique, organize, and agitate against the mechanisms of capitalism and everything that goes with it (economic, political, and social) including the capitalist power structure. Regardless of who is nominated and elected in the 2016 election... the capitalist power structure will remain the same and the responsibility of leftists will remain the same. As far as a third party goes...If Sanders was a Debs and ran as a workers or socialist party candidate leftists could gauge any actual strength on the ground for many anti-capitalist demands. Sanders calling himself a Socialist and a Leftist and running as a Democrat - which is a party of capitalists - presents confusion for leftist demands. That being said... I don't think many leftists would advise or vote for a right-wing reactionary Republican if they decide to vote in this election.

I asked a leftist acquaintance what he thought about the Sanders campaign and the value for leftist political action and this was the response below. It pretty much sums it up for a lot of leftists and it doesn't pull any punches Steven. Cheers

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First, anything and everything I might say on the topic is subject to rigorous critical review and analysis. Sanders is not the "one we have been waiting for," not a guru or savior. The yearning for a savior or guru is an expression of individualism, a product of the corrupt ideology of the bourgeoisie.

There will be people taunting us in the coming months - "hey, nobody's perfect! If you don't like Bernie, then who do you like?" In other words, the can only think in terms of personalities, in the context of individualism. Leadership does and will emerge form the working class. It will not come in the form of gurus and saviors. It will come in the form of martyrs and fighters.

The simple answer is that we support the authentic aspirations of the working class, and resist any attempts by the ruling class to turn those aspirations against us and into the service of advancing the interests of the ruling class. Universal public healthcare? Yes. Universal public education? Yes. Sanders is saying those things. We support that. Not because Sanders is "good" or "right," or "our guy," but rather because, as I said, we support the authentic aspirations of the working class.

At the same time, this is no cause to abandon the left wing positions, and there will be pressure to do just that. We will see two contradictory phenomena unfolding simultaneously. Working class people will be attracted to the Sanders campaign because he is expressing some components that comprise working class aspirations. The enabling class, the functionaries and administrators and sycophants and toadies, will be promoting Sanders as a tool for crushing the Left and co-opting the working class.

Keep in mind that elections tell us where we have been, not where we are going. They are an effect, not a cause of social and political change. You will be told that your left wing criticism is hurting the Sanders campaign, and therefore "helping Republicans." That is a lie. It reveals the speaker to be more committed to preserving the current social and political arrangements than they are committed to the Sanders campaign. Left wing criticism will make it more likely that the Sanders campaign will succeed, not less likely. There would be no Sanders campaign were it not for the desperation of working class people. That is the wind in the sails, not the "beliefs" or "ideals" of the progressive policy wonks. Strong advocacy for working class interests increases that wind. "You lefties need to shut up, stop criticizing and get on the bandwagon" takes wind out of the sails.

We advocate the abolishing Wall Street, not merely reining it in a little.

We advocate the disbanding of the police forces as presently constituted, not merely "citizen oversight" or "reform."

We advocate abolishing so-called "private property" (the commons and the means of production) in the hands of the ruling class not merely some weak and half-hearted effort at making the system of "private property" look a little more equitable.

We advocate the dismantling of the social conventions and arrangements upon which racism and misogyny and bigotry are based, social conventions and arrangements that are forcibly imposed upon us by a small minority of people for their exclusive benefit, not merely the admission of a handful of a few tokens to the halls of power. We advocate the complete and utter demolishing of patriarchy and white supremacy. We do not want to see more African Americans and women sitting on corporate boards, we want to see more corporate board members sitting in prison.

We advocate dismantling the global empire and the reign of terror being waged against humanity, not merely "more diplomacy."

At the same time, we support the aspirations of the working class, in whatever form they may take. Supporting the people who will be attracted to the sanders campaign is one thing. Promoting the personality involved, the candidacy, and the system of which he is a creature, is yet another.

Recently I watched the Burns documentary in the Dust Bowl. It is his best and with watching, I think, in stark contrast to that abomination he made about WWII. It is very compelling hearing the stories of people who lived through the New Deal era. People were put to work, people had access to healthcare and retirement and unemployment benefits, people were freed from the threat of eviction and foreclosure. Massive public works projects to retire and protect the environment were happening. Unions gained in power. Research and education were being financed. Real suffering was being alleviated, and the bankers and industrialists were fighting hard against any and all reforms.

The battle lines were clearly defined.

It is all very seductive and compelling. Yes, Sanders will either fail or else will ultimately serve the purpose of saving Capitalism from itself. Yet, I find myself thinking that maybe if we could back the snarling dogs of Capitalism down for just a brief period of time...

The degree to which the Sanders campaign presents opportunities to advocate the positions I outlined above, use it. The degree to which the Sanders campaign is used to silence the Left, resist it.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Accurate HassleCat Aug 2015 #1
Wow. That's one hell of a political iliteracy if you don't know that. DetlefK Aug 2015 #2
And so the average person must be politically illiterate demwing Aug 2015 #4
Agree ooky Aug 2015 #6
+1 n/t Matrosov Aug 2015 #39
What I learned about socialism in my economics class: Bradical79 Aug 2015 #5
Never has worked...never will...no matter WHO tries to implement that system.nt clarice Aug 2015 #15
Oh god, thank you for the OUT LOUD laughter randys1 Aug 2015 #26
You are quite welcome...how are you Randi? nt clarice Aug 2015 #55
Only if they're Muslims. RiverNoord Aug 2015 #23
There are people who think Capitalism = Freedom too.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #31
Excellent post! I have run into right wing trolls on this site who understand so little PatrickforO Aug 2015 #3
The Nazi's called themselves National Socialists demwing Aug 2015 #7
Sure they did! PatrickforO Aug 2015 #18
Just to clarify demwing Aug 2015 #20
I knew that! We're definitely cool. But when the general election comes around and PatrickforO Aug 2015 #37
"... combines oligarchy with chest-pounding nationalism." Sounds like we have a little bit of Stardust Aug 2015 #58
To boil it down further . . . snot Aug 2015 #8
Why isn't that a Democratic Capitalist? brooklynite Aug 2015 #9
Because virtually all large scale capitalists hifiguy Aug 2015 #12
The answer is, because that is an incorrect definition. The word Socialism in the definition isnt stevenleser Aug 2015 #13
"Democratic Socialists are anti-Capitalist and would seek to do away with Capitalism" brooklynite Aug 2015 #17
And I'm sure you'll be the first to help clear up the confusion demwing Aug 2015 #25
If you have to "clear up the confusion", you're already on the defensive. brooklynite Aug 2015 #34
Failure to respond demwing Aug 2015 #52
Um... What? RiverNoord Aug 2015 #28
You did note that I quoted that verbatim from the post above me, right? brooklynite Aug 2015 #50
lol - yes, my response was directed at him :-) RiverNoord Aug 2015 #67
Do you enjoy just making shit up? HERVEPA Aug 2015 #30
Is that what you call me having links to back me up? No wonder you are so confused! nt stevenleser Aug 2015 #47
Here is a video that I hope you will watch when you can find the time. PotatoChip Aug 2015 #45
I'll watch it, but there are two possibilities. The definition is clear. stevenleser Aug 2015 #51
Better than helping communist dictatorships like the Koch family did with Stalin! cascadiance Aug 2015 #60
Capitalism can't "be restrained" or "controlled"... AOR Aug 2015 #10
The OP is confusing Social Democracy with Democratic Socialism. Democratic Socialists would agree stevenleser Aug 2015 #14
Maybe Steven...can't speak for the OP... AOR Aug 2015 #42
There is a very simple problem with your assertion... stevenleser Aug 2015 #48
Doesn't Bernie caucus and vote with Democrats like 95% of the time or something? AOR Aug 2015 #56
In a Boolean situation, what would you have him do, caucus with the GOP or vote with them? stevenleser Aug 2015 #62
I'm not really sure what you're trying to say overall Steven... AOR Aug 2015 #68
Simple, you tried to make a judgement based on who he caucuses with and votes with. stevenleser Aug 2015 #69
Fair enough Steven clear explanation... AOR Aug 2015 #71
That is an incorrect definition. The Actual Democratic Socialists of America describe themselves stevenleser Aug 2015 #11
They believe in working within capitalism AND within the Democratic Party. See Reply 27. merrily Aug 2015 #29
As far as it will take them, sure. But they are also clearly against Capitalism and for Socialism. stevenleser Aug 2015 #49
That's why the Right listened to Lewis Powell. Octafish Aug 2015 #16
I'm always puzzled when I read that about Americans fearing becoming like Norway or Stardust Aug 2015 #59
You are most welcome. Carey explains how Capital rose to defend itself with a bodyguard of lies. Octafish Aug 2015 #61
Thank you. I'll do my best to spread the word about Alex Carey. Stardust Aug 2015 #63
It doesn't matter what the actual Def is: Socialism is defined by those who practice it. lewebley3 Aug 2015 #19
Sure, Definitions don't matter, only stuff people pull out of their ears matters. merrily Aug 2015 #22
I am Dem I could not vote for socialist. Sanders should not be in the Dem party lewebley3 Aug 2015 #36
He's not a Socialist, so no worries. See Reply 27 and the threads linked in that post. merrily Aug 2015 #38
I watch this man career for about 25 years: He refused to join the Dem for years lewebley3 Aug 2015 #40
You think Dean (former Gov of Vermont and former DNC head) and Schumer didn't also watch his career? merrily Aug 2015 #41
Schummer will not support Sanders: Schummer thinks Obama it too left wing lewebley3 Aug 2015 #46
I think Schumer is too right wing. So? truebluegreen Aug 2015 #57
Then don't vote for him. frylock Aug 2015 #54
Gee, once you explain it, Americans will just line up! yallerdawg Aug 2015 #21
They lined up for FDR. Most elected President in history. merrily Aug 2015 #24
Trump is flying down to Mobile, AL today. yallerdawg Aug 2015 #33
Say Social Security and Medicare. They'll catch on. merrily Aug 2015 #35
Not since Carter... yallerdawg Aug 2015 #43
I don't believe that and polls are to the contrary. Also, please see Reply 27. merrily Aug 2015 #44
Yes, this is the mentality you see down there in many cases. Time for an edumacation!!! cascadiance Aug 2015 #64
That was just code for he's going to help the blacks. N/ azmom Aug 2015 #32
Democrat Socialist--someone who likes the New Deal and the Great Society. merrily Aug 2015 #27
A candidate I would vote for. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #53
THANK YOU!!!! It is a shame that we live in the only western democracy where it is necessary Douglas Carpenter Aug 2015 #65
The Facebooker who wrote that changed a few of the DSA statements muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #66
That's just one definition. To me and my family, it means something else entirely DFW Aug 2015 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is a Democratic Soci...»Reply #71