Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Liberals Separate Race from Class [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)38. Class and race operate both separately and together to impoverish people.
Class and race operate both separately and together to impoverish people. Racism does not explain everything. The greatest leaders of the civil rights movement understood that. Martin Luther King Jr understood it which is why he was focusing on economic issues and anti-capitalism before he was assassinated.

It is impossible to work for economic justice without combating racism but it is entirely possible to focus on racism and ignore economic justice. That's very convenient for maintaining the status quo of economic injustice - blame it on an "attitude". That's why the whitewashed version of civil rights taught in schools totally leaves out, or barely mentions, how civil rights leaders tied economic issues to the struggle.
I think the problem is that many people in America think that racism is an attitude. And this is encouraged by the capitalist system. So they think that what people think is what makes them a racist. Racism is not an attitude.
If a white man wants to lynch me, thats his problem. If hes got the power to lynch me, thats my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; its a question of power.
Racism gets its power from capitalism. Thus, if youre anti-racist, whether you know it or not, you must be anti-capitalist. The power for racism, the power for sexism, comes from capitalism, not an attitude.
You cannot be a racist without power. You cannot be a sexist without power. Even men who beat their wives get this power from the society which allows it, condones it, encourages it. One cannot be against racism, one cannot be against sexism, unless one is against capitalism.
Stokely Carmichael, in answer to a question about racism and sexism
If a white man wants to lynch me, thats his problem. If hes got the power to lynch me, thats my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; its a question of power.
Racism gets its power from capitalism. Thus, if youre anti-racist, whether you know it or not, you must be anti-capitalist. The power for racism, the power for sexism, comes from capitalism, not an attitude.
You cannot be a racist without power. You cannot be a sexist without power. Even men who beat their wives get this power from the society which allows it, condones it, encourages it. One cannot be against racism, one cannot be against sexism, unless one is against capitalism.
Stokely Carmichael, in answer to a question about racism and sexism
Brother Malcolm put it more succinctly
"You can't have racism without capitalism. If you find antiracists, usually they're socialists or their political philosophy is that of socialism."
Malcolm X
Malcolm X
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Good understanding of this explosive issue that seems to have been influenced ...
AuntPatsy
Aug 2015
#2
Yep. I really do believe that was his first goal with his candidacy........
socialist_n_TN
Aug 2015
#42
There is a reason for D politicians Who have adopted a hybrid theory of governance
Dragonfli
Aug 2015
#26
How are you going to change the Police Department's antagonistic process,
Baitball Blogger
Aug 2015
#60
I don't see anyone here separating the two. Well, let me correct that. I DO see people here
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#45
I see people here who almost reflexively try to shift a racial injustice topic into an economic one
Gormy Cuss
Aug 2015
#46
What's really tiresome is to see such an enormous issue, ignored mostly by the same people
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#48
This analysis is mistaken, of course. It is, of course, from a socialist magazine ....
kwassa
Aug 2015
#33
+10^10^100. The piece is extremely poorly written and makes points that don't follow at all.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#40
So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities? That appears
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#47
"So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities?"
NuclearDem
Aug 2015
#49
What does any of that have to do with fighting for economic equality? And just WHO has ever said
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#50
You are diverting the topic. This thread is about BLM, not income equality per se.
kwassa
Aug 2015
#53
The topic is 'why Liberals Separate Racism from Class'. That is what the title of the OP
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#55
It's not just the AA posters on DU. Huge majorities of black people everywhere have been saying this
Number23
Aug 2015
#87
I have to wonder if O.J. Simpson had been poor, not having celebrity and economic power would the
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#52
Nobody is saying it will, but economic justice will go a long way toward leveling the playing field.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#58
Shameless bullshit allegation - and you know it is. Twisting the truth that they are sometimes
bettyellen
Aug 2015
#68
Who is "they"? It is just a charge being thrown about. Capitalism requires division, an hierachy
mmonk
Aug 2015
#41
You're right but that person will never be able to accept that. If you have bought into
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#90