Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ''Does this picture make me look guilty?'' [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)70. You're proving my point, though--in 1980, he ran against Reagan, and LOST.
He wasn't the first choice as VP, either--he was only an afterthought after Reagan got pissed at Ford.
If those "Agents for Bush" were so all-powerful, he would have slid into the gig. Instead, he got in by way of Gerald Ford's "co-presidential" hubris.
They aren't pals in this pic, they are OPPONENTS:

E3-2, Republican Debate with Ronald Reagan, Philip Crane, George Bush and John Anderson with moderator Eric Sevareid in Chicago , Illinois . 3/13/80.
Feb 23, 1980.
In the New Hampshire primary, a single symbolic act dramatized the debut of Reagan's new image as a candidate and the demise of Bush's presidential hopes. It occurred during what was scheduled to be a two-person debate between Bush and Reagan in Nashua, New Hampshire, on Feburary 23, the Saturday before balloting. As it turned out, Bush crumpled under pressure orchestrated by Reagan's camp.
Initially, both Reagan and Bush had seen advantages in a two-person debate sponsored by a local newspaper. When the FEC ruled that newspaper sponsorship of the debate amounted to an illegal campaign contribution and when Bush refused to pay half of the debate's cost, Reagan agreed to underwrite it himself.
Reagan then moved to include the other five contenders - a move that identified him both as a candidate and a unifier. When the other candidates showed up on stage, Bush froze.
As Reagan made his case for inclusion of the other candidates, the moderator ordered Reagan's mike turned off. Reagan responded, "I'm paying for this microphone, Mr. Green." The fact that the moderator's name was Breen seemed to matter little. The crowd cheered. When neither newspaper hosting the debate nor Bush would accede to the inclusion of the others, the other candidates left the stage. Reagan's prospects had been boosted, Bush's buried. Reagan carried New Hampshire 50% to Bush's 23%.
In the New Hampshire primary, a single symbolic act dramatized the debut of Reagan's new image as a candidate and the demise of Bush's presidential hopes. It occurred during what was scheduled to be a two-person debate between Bush and Reagan in Nashua, New Hampshire, on Feburary 23, the Saturday before balloting. As it turned out, Bush crumpled under pressure orchestrated by Reagan's camp.
Initially, both Reagan and Bush had seen advantages in a two-person debate sponsored by a local newspaper. When the FEC ruled that newspaper sponsorship of the debate amounted to an illegal campaign contribution and when Bush refused to pay half of the debate's cost, Reagan agreed to underwrite it himself.
Reagan then moved to include the other five contenders - a move that identified him both as a candidate and a unifier. When the other candidates showed up on stage, Bush froze.
As Reagan made his case for inclusion of the other candidates, the moderator ordered Reagan's mike turned off. Reagan responded, "I'm paying for this microphone, Mr. Green." The fact that the moderator's name was Breen seemed to matter little. The crowd cheered. When neither newspaper hosting the debate nor Bush would accede to the inclusion of the others, the other candidates left the stage. Reagan's prospects had been boosted, Bush's buried. Reagan carried New Hampshire 50% to Bush's 23%.
Reagan crushed Bush with a little old fashioned out-maneuvering. If some mysterious "PTB" were in fact behind this circus, they wouldn't have permitted this to happen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sadly MIC = big $$$$$'s, and they don't want to interrupt that gravy train! n/t
RKP5637
Aug 2015
#51
Their countenances are so revealing I almost feel sorry for their eternal souls.
Octafish
Aug 2015
#8
Like the Great Gatsby, they are not like us. American's have no idea how different they really are.
jalan48
Aug 2015
#20
Would love to know the true nature of that underground connected-ness.
Cracklin Charlie
Aug 2015
#81
GHW Bush went to university at a school that was commonly mined for intelligence assets.
MADem
Aug 2015
#18
I was living in Iran at the time. I don't think the fact that you happened to be alive during the
MADem
Aug 2015
#84
Jim Baker's connections were closer to Bush than Reagan and Bush came before Baker.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#99
Poppy got powerful via National Security Decision Directive No. 159 (NSDD 159)
Octafish
Aug 2015
#25
Babs has her hand on Bush Sr. as if to say..."there, there, don't drool in public"
dixiegrrrrl
Aug 2015
#21
So the next time we hear Jeb say we need "4% economic growth", what he is really saying is:
sorechasm
Aug 2015
#54
SHAMESHAMESHAMESHAMESHAMEfullspectrumdominanceSHAMESHAMESHAMESHAMESHAME
Dont call me Shirley
Aug 2015
#93
I wonder what Barbara (Why should I waste my beautiful mind?) Bush is thinking?
Brother Buzz
Aug 2015
#13
Dang, she IS so pointing! Probably subconsciously (but revealingly, with the smile).
WinkyDink
Aug 2015
#34
look at the sheer cowardice in his eyes: he knows that any vet, even if totally vetted,
MisterP
Aug 2015
#39
Only one of four Bushes knows how to respond to the Pledge of Allegiance
sinkingfeeling
Aug 2015
#83
gergee w bush, destroyer of people, lands, & historic treasures. and the crap
pansypoo53219
Aug 2015
#87