Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
34. That was an interesting proposition.
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 10:49 AM
Aug 2015
“USPS could partner with banks to make a critical difference for millions of Americans who don’t have basic banking services because there are almost no banks or bank branches in their neighborhoods,” Warren wrote in a Huffington Post op-ed on Saturday. The op-ed picked up on a report from the USPS’s Inspector General that proposed using the agency’s extensive physical infrastructure to extend basics like debit cards and small-dollar loans to the same communities that the banking industry has generally ignored. The report found that 68 million Americans don’t have bank accounts and spent $89 billion in 2012 on interest and fees for the kinds of basic financial services that USPS could begin offering.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/02/03/3239261/elizabeth-warren-post-office-financial-services/

Definitely not equivalent to nationalizing the banks, but rather a suggestion to help people without a lot of money access banking services without getting creamed with fees for not carrying enough of a balance.

I thought it sounded like a worthwhile idea.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good OP. One nitpick: Bernie has never advocated for an economic revolution, but a political one. Scuba Aug 2015 #1
good catch!! gobears10 Aug 2015 #2
Great OP. You nailed it. mmonk Aug 2015 #3
That seems a good explanation muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #4
Most of the current GOP are technically safeinOhio Aug 2015 #5
+1 mmonk Aug 2015 #6
Now, all you have to do is explain that "technical difference" to the voters... brooklynite Aug 2015 #7
I don't know about him, but I don't want to explain it to voters. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #10
And that's the key, and do it with multiple videos of him out there saying he is a Socialist or stevenleser Aug 2015 #26
I'm guilty myself, although it's part of a deliberate attempt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #8
The overlap with Socialism, Scandinavia, and Bernie is one he chooses and rejects conveniently. Sancho Aug 2015 #9
What other social issues 'like' gun control? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #11
Here's a few...got to go to work now, but this should do... Sancho Aug 2015 #12
Oddly, National Nurses Union endorsed him largely based on the Robin Hood tax. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #13
Maybe their retirement is not invested in state funds? Sancho Aug 2015 #38
Meh - the UK currently has a 0.5% transaction tax on stock purchases muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #17
Yes, I'm a member...and our local state analysis shows the tax would hurt retirees here. Sancho Aug 2015 #37
It looks to me like unions support it muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #40
There may be some differences across states and unions. Sancho Aug 2015 #42
Sanders has specified that he is a Demcoratic Socialist. I take him at his word. merrily Aug 2015 #14
he's incorrect in his usage gobears10 Aug 2015 #15
I am not so sure of that, as to the USA merrily Aug 2015 #16
The DSA is the point: muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #18
Believing in collectives and cooperatives does not equal believing goverment should seize merrily Aug 2015 #20
From the OP: muriel_volestrangler Aug 2015 #22
That is not the definition of socialism, though. merrily Aug 2015 #23
And all of that is fine, but a lot of people in the U.S. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #19
And that is why fixating on labels is counter-productive. merrily Aug 2015 #21
Our generation sure (or maybe our parents) - TBF Aug 2015 #24
Millennials are definitely less redphobic. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #25
But not by enough that it is likely to matter. Only 69% of 18-29's willing to consider voting for stevenleser Aug 2015 #27
Yeah, I've sent that poll to some of the optimists in my organization too. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #30
Agreed. As I said in my above comment to Brooklynite, you aren't going to be able to fight stevenleser Aug 2015 #28
Especially when a large part of the population already thinks President Obama Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #31
Agree that "social democrat" is the more applicable term. DirkGently Aug 2015 #29
what about the post office banks Mrs. Warren mentioned a couple years ago? Sunlei Aug 2015 #33
That was an interesting proposition. DirkGently Aug 2015 #34
or at least allow some new banks to open to give competition to the big 4? who control the USA Sunlei Aug 2015 #39
Sanders has been a sitting Senator for decades. He must have done something right to be so beloved. Sunlei Aug 2015 #32
Would you say the same for Strom Thurmond? brooklynite Aug 2015 #35
He was loved by the 'slavery system' voters, doesn't his son sit on the 'for profit' prison corp Sunlei Aug 2015 #36
That's a good point... Sancho Aug 2015 #41
a lot of people... gobears10 Aug 2015 #43
He's got my vote. Iggo Aug 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders is technic...»Reply #34