Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts) Wed Aug 26, 2015, 08:17 AM Aug 2015

2

So now Ambassador Caroline Kennedy is coming under scrutiny for use of private e-mails [View all]

Why the hell we just admit that this is a ongoing problem for the entire Federal Government work force. And nothing was illegal about until the name Clinton came up it. http://www.mediaite.com/online/ambassador-caroline-kennedy-scrutinized-for-use-of-private-email/

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So now Ambassador Caroline Kennedy is coming under scrutiny for use of private e-mails [View all] bigdarryl Aug 2015 OP

I still don't understand the idea that if somebody else is doing something wrong Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #1

I rather suspect Caroline Kennedy has entitlement issues. merrily Aug 2015 #2

I am sure you have a source for the school story dsc Aug 2015 #4

Did when I first read it a few years back. Probably still available through google or merrily Aug 2015 #5

that isn't how this works dsc Aug 2015 #7

That is not how I work. If someone makes a claim I disbelieve, I google. Only if I cannot find it merrily Aug 2015 #9

Voila... meaculpa2011 Aug 2015 #8

Exactly. With enough info given, it takes more time to ask for a link than it does to find it. merrily Aug 2015 #11

yes God forbid we argue about sources dsc Aug 2015 #12

Is this source lofty enough for you? ... meaculpa2011 Aug 2015 #13

Find anything to disprove the story? Any denial from Klein or Caroline? merrily Aug 2015 #14

So if I read on the bathroom wall dsc Aug 2015 #15

Um, no. You're attempting the logical fallacies of reductio ad absurdum merrily Aug 2015 #16

So any source that doesn't measure up to your lofty... meaculpa2011 Aug 2015 #17

the New Yorker is different dsc Aug 2015 #18

You should get yourself a crayon... meaculpa2011 Aug 2015 #20

Oh, we can't do that. Too many people here fell for it. leftofcool Aug 2015 #3

blah, blah, blah DURHAM D Aug 2015 #6

If the NSA is reading it all anyway, LuvNewcastle Aug 2015 #10

This was wrong and the important thing is that the SD IG is pointing it out karynnj Aug 2015 #19

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So now Ambassador Carolin...