Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(36,418 posts)

11. No, that's not profiling, which is preemptive.

Mon May 21, 2012, 11:56 AM

May 2012

Matching a description of a suspect is legally (and constitutionally) very different from being profiled for a crime that hasn't been committed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Profiling. Is any sort of profiling okay? [View all] Stinky The Clown May 2012 OP

It is a necessary part of crime investigation.. pipoman May 2012 #1

Only if it is also inconsequential. bemildred May 2012 #2

FBI profiling seems okay to me justiceischeap May 2012 #3

Is it reasonable for airline security to scrutinize more closely Nye Bevan May 2012 #4

Gun nuts are automatically suspect. See George Zimmerman. nt onehandle May 2012 #6

profiling can be essential alc May 2012 #8

Behavioral profiling makes perfect sense 4th law of robotics May 2012 #10

No, that's not profiling, which is preemptive. leveymg May 2012 #11

Depends on the purpose it's done for. 99Forever May 2012 #12

The first profile is assuming that the suspect is male braddy May 2012 #13