Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: chris matthews "you don't need a gun in DC". [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)107. They certainly didn't admit they did, as you have asserted.
of course the poor dears did nothing wrong and just decided to settle for the hell of it. Right. Oh, and here are the stats on VA supplying guns up and down the east coast.
They certainly didn't admit they did, as you have asserted. How many unsupported assertions is that now? It happens all the time, settlements without admission of guilt.
Oh, and your link isn't about VA supplying guns to anyone. Its about individuals - not the state of VA or gun dealers - breaking the law. You need to take some classes at the school of "just because I said something or characterize something a certain way, reality does not automatically change to make it so".
The one-gun-a-month laws help by slowing the pace of weapon-gathering. In the four years before Virginia passed a one-gun law that took effect in 1993, 35 percent of guns recovered in criminal investigations in Northeastern states, from New Jersey through Massachusetts, came from Virginia. Two years later, the figure was 16 percent.
Another case of 'attack criminality by limiting the law abiding, rather than attacking directly the criminality or the criminal, itself, because the ends justify the means'.
Color.me.Shocked.
That methodology is the hallmark of the modern anti-gun/prohibitionist movement. Their bread and butter, in fact. I take it you count yourself among their ranks?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've worked in both NYC and DC and have never owned a gun. Never needed one nor do I want one.
madinmaryland
Aug 2015
#1
I worked in Manhattan, 42nd and Lexington. I would routinely walk outside at night after
phylny
Aug 2015
#34
I think a moderate amount of research would suggest that gun control laws have no effect
the band leader
Aug 2015
#24
If gun control decreases shootings, why are there so many shootings in Baltimore,
the band leader
Aug 2015
#65
Manufacturer's have no freaking way of knowing who is going to buy their firearms
GGJohn
Aug 2015
#84
if you had asked more nicely I would have quoted this article but since you were such a jerk
dsc
Aug 2015
#96
I've lived in rural areas...on farms or villages without police most of my adult life
HereSince1628
Aug 2015
#31
It depends. If the thief knows you have something worthwhile your dog won't stop him.
the band leader
Aug 2015
#63
I am sure you way over estimate the changes you will ever need a gun. Most people do. nt
Logical
Aug 2015
#100
By the same reasoning, most people similarly overestimate their chances of being threatened by one.
Lizzie Poppet
Aug 2015
#110
Similar but the probability you will be a victim of violent crime is about 100x higher
Statistical
Aug 2015
#116