Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

boxman15

(1,033 posts)

5. Obviously, extreme situations like the rise of Nazi Germany call for violence, but

Reply to Robb (Original post)

Mon May 21, 2012, 03:45 PM

May 2012

most movements that are successful are nonviolent in nature and begin to falter when violence comes into play. The Civil Rights Movement was successful because of the nonviolent nature of everything. It only began to die out when violence, provoked by hate groups and the FBI, became more mainstream in the movement. It's always important to be nonviolent except in self-defense.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Poll question: Who is more correct on violence, Malcolm or Mahatma? [View all] Robb May 2012 OP

Push poll. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #1

I thought about adding Cesar Chavez, but it's a little nuanced for most. Robb May 2012 #2

Your implication is that OWS is trying to achieve something UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #10

Non-violence usually works. But not always. MannyGoldstein May 2012 #3

LOL. Then they laugh at you, then they fight you, eh? Robb May 2012 #4

Obviously, extreme situations like the rise of Nazi Germany call for violence, but boxman15 May 2012 #5

More Malcolm: KamaAina May 2012 #6

Where's the dingbat option? KamaAina May 2012 #7

Both are equal. Arctic Dave May 2012 #8

The correct approach is always the one that wins 4th law of robotics May 2012 #9

"The correct approach is always the one that wins." UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #12

Ghandi vs. the Nazis: "The Last Article" by Harry Turtledove Johnny Rico May 2012 #20

A good short story 4th law of robotics May 2012 #24

Faulty Premise, Sir The Magistrate May 2012 #11

And there you go Your Honor...... socialist_n_TN May 2012 #25

This is why we vote. Major Hogwash May 2012 #13

OWS is based on Ghandi's philosophy and they have adhered to those principles. sabrina 1 May 2012 #14

The thing they've stressed before every protest UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #15

I think they are not familiar with the movement, that is what I have sabrina 1 May 2012 #18

I was represented by the National Lawyers Guild UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #19

They are real heroes. I am glad you were represented by them. And the fact that they were available sabrina 1 May 2012 #23

. Go Vols May 2012 #16

Shays was a well known anarchist. UnrepentantLiberal May 2012 #17

I'll side with Malcolm since his quote doesn't play the "magic bullet" game. TheKentuckian May 2012 #21

they both had their crusades finished off by violence. provis99 May 2012 #22

Yes, but wouldn't it be nice if they hadn't RZM May 2012 #26

All things being equal: non-violent wins RobertEarl May 2012 #27