Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: People of color [View all]

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
26. I am suprised that Gingrich has not been laughed off of the National Stage by now, what a ass-hat!
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 04:11 AM
Dec 2011

From the Book, ‘Economic Development’ Ninth Edition by Michael P. Todaro and Stephen C. Smith
Page 372 to 373

Child Labor

Child labor is a widespread problem in developing countries. When children under age 14 work, their labor time disrupts their schooling and in majority of cases prevents them from attending school altogether. Compounding this, the health of child workers is significantly worse, even accounting for their poverty status, than that of children who do not work; physical stunting among child laborers is very common. In addition, a large fraction of laboring children are subject to especially cruel and exploitative working conditions.

The International Labor Office (ILO), a UN body that has played a leading role on the child labor issue, recently estimated that some 120 million children in developing countries between the ages of 5 to 14 are working full time, with another 130 million working half time. Some 61% of the 250 million working children, or nearly 153 million, live in Asia, while 32%, or 80 million, live in Africa, and 7%, or over 17 million, live in Latin America. Although Asia has the largest number of child laborers, in relative terms, Africa has the highest child labor rate, estimated at about 41% of all children between 5 and 14 years old. the rates for Asia and Latin America are 21% and 17%, respectively. These numbers do not even include the many children who work full time at home for their parents or guardians. Working conditions are often horrendous; the ILO reports that some of surveys show that more than half of working children toil for nine or more hours per day. Moreover, at least 180 million child laborers are either under 14 years of age or work in conditions that endangers their health or well-being, involving hazards, sexual exploitation, trafficking, and debt bondage. This includes 110 million children under the age of 15 doing hazardous work. Some 73 million working children are under the age of 10, effectively working as indentured servants. They earned less than half the adult wage and often worked in excess of 80 hours per week, many in carpet- and brick-making factories. Thus child labor is not an isolated problem, but a pervasive one, especially in Africa and South Asia.

Nevertheless, it is not obvious that an immediate ban on all forms of child labor is always in the best interests of the child. Without work, a child may become severely malnourished; with work, school fees as well as basic nutrition and health care may be available. But there is one set of circumstances under which both the child laborer and the family as a whole may be unambiguously better off with a ban on child labor: multiple equilibria. Kaushik Basu has provided such an analysis, and we first consider his simple model that shows how this problem may arise.

To model child labor, we make two important assumptions: First, a household with a sufficiently high income world not send its children to work. As one might hope, there is strong evidence that this is true, at least most of the time. Second, child and adult labor are substitutes. In fact, children are not as productive as adults, and adults can do any work that children can do. This assertion is not an assumption; it is a finding of many studies of the productivity of child laborers in many countries. It is important to emphasize this, because on rationalization for child labor often heard is that children have special productive abilities, such as small fingers, that make them important for the production of rugs and other products. However, there is no support for this view. In essentially every task that has been studied, including carpet weaving, adult laborers are significantly more productive. As a result, we can consider the supply of adult and child labor together in an economic analysis of the problem.

The book goes on to explain mathematically; child labor does not benefit the economy because of the production of the child is lower compared to an adult, the money paid to a child is less as an adult leading a contraction of the economy, and most of all, having a working child and non-working adult in the family will lead more debt. Subsequently, a society that allows working children not going to school and non-working adults will lead to extreme poverty (possible slavery) for that society as a whole.

In addition, the book explains child labor needs to halted worldwide in moderate fashion, i.e. slowly, not expanding it as Newt Gingrich would lead us to believe!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

People of color [View all] jmbar2 Feb 2021 OP
"particularly in the poorest neighborhoods" ohheckyeah Dec 2011 #1
The argument that Newt made Harmony Blue Dec 2011 #9
I'm no longer even surprised ohheckyeah Dec 2011 #21
What makes Gingrich think schools could even hire more staff to begin with? Selatius Dec 2011 #2
Well, that is simple! polmaven Dec 2011 #11
The crowds are very helpful. Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #3
I'm hoping Obama's team put together an ad of these atrocities they cheer for: Whisp Dec 2011 #40
I don't think any of them are that old quaker bill Dec 2011 #4
Well, I rememer working in the school cafeteria for lunch at the age back in the 60's notadmblnd Dec 2011 #19
It doesn't happen any more, it was considered discriminatory Lifelong Protester Dec 2011 #53
Do they realize the burrowowl Dec 2011 #5
A month? RUMMYisFROSTED Dec 2011 #16
+100 Bingo sce56 Dec 2011 #20
Oh. don't worry They_Live Dec 2011 #35
Oliver anyone PatrynXX Dec 2011 #6
Newt should steal clips from Oliver for commercials jberryhill Dec 2011 #7
When was the last time any one of them cleaned a toilet? Scuba Dec 2011 #8
And what work did Newtie do as a child... wait, he was a military brat living off the government JCMach1 Dec 2011 #10
And as an assistant professor of history, he never published and failed to get tenure aint_no_life_nowhere Dec 2011 #44
I belong to a different race than Republicans. mmonk Dec 2011 #12
Too 'bad' only the 50 people watching witnessed it! n/a Zax2me Dec 2011 #13
Middle Class sulphurdunn Dec 2011 #14
You have succinctly addressed a number of the flaws in Gingrich's logic on this matter... truth2power Dec 2011 #18
I can find no evidence sulphurdunn Dec 2011 #58
Child labor is definitely cheaper than adult labor rurallib Dec 2011 #15
The GOP is one sick crowd. sarcasmo Dec 2011 #17
Let's recap the score shall we? Initech Dec 2011 #39
More evidence that the GOP wants to turn the Labor Clock back to 1850 jpak Dec 2011 #22
I'm actually in favor of kids working in school, but it has nothing to do with child labor Voice for Peace Dec 2011 #23
A five year old should be learning simple math skills, reading, and english. Dawgs Dec 2011 #45
thanks for the welcome Voice for Peace Dec 2011 #52
I never thought this would ever be an issue again. Just shows clearly the principles of republicans. gtar100 Dec 2011 #24
These people are stuck on the grade-school playground Azathoth Dec 2011 #25
I am suprised that Gingrich has not been laughed off of the National Stage by now, what a ass-hat! mrdmk Dec 2011 #26
But he hasn't been laughed off onlyadream Dec 2011 #27
No one laughed him off the stage when he said that children of welfare recipients kdmorris Dec 2011 #33
I hate Gingrich so much that I'm gladly setting aside my substantial misgivings about coalition_unwilling Dec 2011 #50
Sickening onlyadream Dec 2011 #28
And when did they immigrate? GTurck Dec 2011 #31
Mother Jones has a very good article regarding Newt and his "earning-by-learning" program. unapatriciated Dec 2011 #29
I am sick... GTurck Dec 2011 #30
I have to go throw up now.....nt zanana1 Dec 2011 #32
This is exactly what the Republicans hope will be your kid's future. olegramps Dec 2011 #34
Is there an applause sign and the repuke sheeple audience members just respond or are SammyWinstonJack Dec 2011 #36
They are really that callous. emulatorloo Dec 2011 #43
Children For Newt 2012 SHRED Dec 2011 #37
Excellent. geardaddy Dec 2011 #46
thanks SHRED Dec 2011 #49
It looks great. geardaddy Dec 2011 #55
This is the Republicans' new twist on Regan's "Southern Strategy." olegramps Dec 2011 #38
Well put. DefenseLawyer Dec 2011 #42
Technicality, but Nixon was the father of the 'Southern Strategy' not Reagan, although coalition_unwilling Dec 2011 #51
Thanks. Yes you are correct. Reagan used it effectively to split the country. olegramps Dec 2011 #60
The more I think about this, the angrier I get onlyadream Dec 2011 #41
My Grandfather Was 10 1/2 When He Woked His First Job in a Coal Mine, Working 12 Hour Shifts mikekohr Dec 2011 #47
That's Republicans for you Aerows Dec 2011 #54
Why doesn’t someone ask Newt how many School Floors he moped as a child? Cigar11 Dec 2011 #48
Newtie was swabbing the deck for his math teacher kenny blankenship Dec 2011 #59
Teabagger/rethuglicans need replacements to pick the crops and also break unions made up of adults workinclasszero Dec 2011 #56
... BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2011 #57
I can't even begin to explain these right wing fuckers MrScorpio Dec 2011 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People of color»Reply #26