Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: People are dying who do not have to die [View all]matt819
(10,749 posts)11. OK, but. . .
I fully support just about any control you can think of when it comes to guns. Name checks, waiting periods, no open carry, no concealed carry, as many police or government approvals you can think of.
However, look at the 18 states with gun deaths under 10 per 100K. Eight of those have pretty lax gun laws. The issue is more complex than just the gun control requirements.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Have you noticed that in every case, when people die who do not have to die, it is because of
PatrickforO
Sep 2015
#1
SOooo... Opinions running pro-gun control run much higher in metro areas.
HereSince1628
Sep 2015
#32
Yes, where it's been examined waiting periods have been shown to reduce impulsive gun suicides.
HereSince1628
Sep 2015
#33
What would you say are the reasons states with the same gun laws are on opposite ends of this graph?
bunnies
Sep 2015
#22